this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
46 points (96.0% liked)

Star Trek Social Club

12562 readers
229 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
08-14 SNW 3x06 "The Sehlat Who Ate Its Tail"
08-21 SNW 3x07 "What Is Starfleet?"
08-28 SNW 3x08 "Four-and-a-Half Vulcans"
09-04 SNW 3x09 "Terrarium"
09-11 SNW 3x10 "New Life and New Civilizations"

Episode Discussion Archive


In Production

Strange New Worlds (2025-07-17)

Starfleet Academy (2026)


In Development

Untitled theatrical film

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I see the trailer, I don't think is the best serie in the world, but I think can be something fun to watch, to nowdays standards that is enough to me really.

I need to watch it to have an opinion, I have the feeling people need to give a chance at least, I did with Voyager despite all the negative critics I saw.

What you think about this?

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's the internet. There's going to be "backlash" regardless.

Though to be honest, people seem pretty high on SFA, both here an in other online spaces I visit.

I think there's a lot of potential in the concept, and the trailer looked great.

Either way, I'd much rather talk about the show than the people talking about the show.

[–] rayckeith@techhub.social 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

@ValueSubtracted it's too early for a backlash. This must be a front-lash.

It's lashes all the way down.

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I’d rather talk about reactions to a show that’s actually happening — even if they are based only on a trailer and pre promotional interviews — than endless hyping, speculation and claims of groundswells of fan enthusiasm about projects that aren’t happening.

Now that it’s no longer the officially sanctioned con, STLV’s panels seem to be set up to encourage producers and actors to hype projects that never even got to the development he’ll’ stage let alone any consideration for being greenlit. These include Tarantino’s bat-sh*t movie idea, Captain Worf, Legacy and the recently revealed Unity proposal.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 19 points 21 hours ago

i can't wait to watch it but also fuck paramount so i'm torrenting it

[–] stargazingpenguin@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We've seen basically nothing of it other than a short trailer, so it's way too early for anyone to be deciding whether it'll be good or not! I'm planning to give it a try, just like I have with every other Trek show so far. If I like it, I'll continue watching. If I don't, I won't!

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] stargazingpenguin@lemmy.zip 3 points 18 hours ago

It is a hot take, I know! 😂

[–] dax@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Honestly, after Picard and Discovery I'm pretty much done with "New Trek", I've lost my interest. For this I'm not even the target audience - this seems aimed at teens / young adults. And it's once again produced by Alex Kurzman. So... yeah, I'm gonna give it a pass.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ya seen strange new worlds???

[–] dax@feddit.org 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I've watched the first couple episodes with no expectations, didn't hate them, didn't love them.. I don't really know why - just didn't click with me. Might give it another shot!

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 8 points 19 hours ago

It really is a throwback to the TNG days, more story than action but can be dark like DS9

[–] brianary@startrek.website 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

LD and SNW are easily some of the best Trek series.

How would TNG have fared if people dipped out at ep 2?

[–] dax@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago

True, I may not have given SNW the chance it deserved. I've watched all 3 seasons of Picard though and almost 2 seasons of Discovery

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So, why didn't you like Discovery?

[–] dax@feddit.org 3 points 2 hours ago

For me, Star Trek was mostly about a possible brighter future. Humanity overcame the issues on earth, no longer relies on money/capitalism, etc. When your watch the crew on TNG, they are acting professionally and with a code of ethics.

Discovery is so miserable. Everyone is angry all the time, there's racism, lots of unnecessary drama, people acting extremely unprofessionally. Same with Picard. Especially sour about how they made one of the best characters - Q - also very serious and miserable. He could've been the comedic relief the series needed, without undermining the rest of the story. The "Picard speeches" are just badly written too, so whimsical and empty.

We have a million dystopian Sci-fi series already, why do we need more? I feel writers are no longer able to tell compelling stories without fake drama. It's possible to engage with modern day issues in a different way, especially by showing how to be better.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 2 points 8 hours ago

I was hardly the target audience for Lower Decks; in fact, I was a little mad they had made an adult animated Star Trek comedy. However, after watching it, it has become a favorite. Season 1 is a bit difficult to get through, but once you get through that, overall, it's a show that's very sincere to what Star Trek is while still being a comedy. And it should have gotten 2 more seasons.

Same with Star Trek: Prodigy: it takes a second, and it's still technically a kids show, but when it gets there, it's worth it.

Honestly, I'm half hopeful for the show just because it's a "We're going for the {X} demographic" kind of show that sounds a little like a stupid idea that will actually turn out unexpectedly good but get cancelled before its time.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The first Star Trek that doesn't receive any backlash is the first Star Trek I'm not interested in.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Eh, it should depend on the nature of the backlash, IMO.

Whining about a black lead? Yea, that's good backlash to hate on.

Whining that they've completely remove the intellectualism of Star Trek in favor of drama, nostalgia, and flashy things on screen? Yea, that's totally valid backlash, the kind that got us SNW in the first place.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I don't recall SNW having any significant backlash. Were you not interested in that one?

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I dunno', I kindof agree with a lot of their points. Quippy bantering should be reserved for the extroverted characters when it's a near constant thing, and not all characters should be extroverts.

The Disneyficiation of Hollywood is totally valid critique. Not every show needs to have Guardians of the Galaxy levels of quippy banter.

Not to say they ruined SNW with it, but it was pretty noticable. The show is leagues better than Disco or Picard in respecting the nature of Star Trek.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Everything gets a "backlash" on the internet. If it says Star Trek on it, I'm going to at least try it. That easy.

(Disclaimer: Unless it's absolutely blatantly not Star Trek. And even then I might be curious. Section 31 was difficult.)

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Section 31 was perfectly passable as a non Star Trek thing. If it were a random sci-fi movie it had fun moments. As Star Trek? Good lord it was garbage.

[–] eryops@dice.camp 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

@cuchi These franchises sag under their own weight until there's nothing left. Star Wars is more guilty, pumping out so much content nothing means anything anymore. It's difficult for me to drop any form of objectivity with it these days... "Do or do not, there is no try." "Only Sith deal in absolutes."

Star Trek is on a lower trajectory compared to Star Wars, but neither can escape the gravity of enshittification. Chances are, I'd enjoy this more than the latest Star Wars tripe.

[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 5 points 1 day ago

With Star Wars, they didn't even do the main film franchise well. Episode 7 was okay, but 8 was such hot garbage I read up on why and found out there was no overarching plan for the trilogy, and different directors for each. No wonder they pulled a J.K. Rowling to completely change the rules of their own systems to meet the needs of the (bad) plot, and shit all over their own franchise. Skywalker might as well have been given a Super Time Turner to save the day in 8.

Disney Star Wars films are bad fan fiction, not canon.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 1 points 20 hours ago

You are talking about Enterprise?

[–] rogermccoy@startrek.website 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's the same dumb cycle that's happened with every new Trek show since TNG (and probably TAS). It's tiresome, but at least it's predicable, I guess? Just ignore the obligatory backlash and see how it turns out.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

No, no, this time Star Trek will be woke. I can tell by the trailer. It's never been woke before.

‘Fans’ fundraised to pay for full page advertisements in major US newspapers as a campaign to persuade NBC not to broadcast TAS even after its season one production was almost complete.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Ok, I’ll bite. From the trailer, it just looks like another season of Discovery. Same look and feel, same era, many of the same cast members. And since I didn’t care for Discovery, I doubt I will care for this either.

I really wish SkyDance would bring in a new showrunner after this round of Star Trek programs is over.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Ok, I’ll bite. From the trailer, it just looks like another season of Discovery. Same look and feel, same era, many of the same cast members. And since I didn’t care for Discovery, I doubt I will care for this either.

Exactly!

The post apocalyptic Discovery future is just something I couldn't care less about. It's not interesting, and this show looks like a direct sequel to it.

They didn't even change it to an actual Academy, instead also putting it on a spaceship to just keep doing the same kind of thing, but with more excuses for the "younger and edgier" crew. So many alarmbells ringing.

It doesn't help that I grew up with the Starfleet Academy videogame, and thus that period is forever linked to it.

[–] arex@startrek.website 5 points 1 day ago

I certainly wasn't expecting it to take place after Discovery, I thought it would be around the same time as Prodigy. I guess restarting the academy after The Burn could be more interesting, either way, I'm looking forward to seeing it.

[–] LiveLaughLong@startrek.website 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I'm tired of cameos and fanservice.

Spend less time trying to get us to like it because 'memba' and spend the effort on more interesting plotlines.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

I haven’t noticed much backlash, though I’m sure you can find some in the usual discontented corners of the internet. Personally I’m optimistic, but we really don’t have all that much information yet. The trailer mostly sold the tone, but it seemed like the right tone.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

OHHH wait I remember this conversation from Disco, lemme see if I can still do the spiel.

I think it's good if it brings more fans to series and in a way I envy the idea of them wanting more Star Trek and finding out about TNG, DS9 and VOY.

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 3 points 22 hours ago

Many of us used to say the same about TNG, DS9 and Voyager bringing fans to TOS, TAS and the TOS movies.

But others of us just tried to give each show a chance to become favourites on their own merits.

In terms of the GenZs in our household, who had seen all the classic series by the end of middle school, the new shows have superceded their old favourites. One’s really into animated Trek, another loves Discovery. Star Trek Online has also played a role in retaining interest in the franchise.

[–] mrcleanup@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm so out of touch now. I used to watch a lot of Star Trek when everything was broadcast television. I just can't bring myself to get a subscription just for Star Trek though.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago

I mean, I think you have pretty based reasons to sail the high seas, frankly.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think part of it is people are so annoyed with entertainment companies in general that it's hard to know if you're worried about something real about the show or you're just fatigued.

Also, personally, I feel like people have actually been relatively quiet about STA, although maybe it's just the community I'm in. Personally, with headlines about Robert Picardo's character being "deeper", I'm almost certain he'll be 100% comic relief, and the show may be unexpectedly good, if Star Trek: Prodigy is anything to judge by.

Mostly, I just hope they don't do the most basic Klingon plot they can think of - I think it would be great if the Qo'nos Klingons were relatively well off post-burn due to a philosophical shift, but they'll probably have something like they were devastated by civil war after possibly being a Federation member.

EDIT: I mean, almost all of the better newer series have been forays into a genre - LD adult animated comedy and PRO children's drama. If STA's trying to aim towards a tween/teen niche, maybe it will also follow that. The only one to break the pattern is S31 somewhat, in the sense it was an action movie attempt, but still within the general sci-fi drama standard of Trek.