this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
21 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45246 readers
3721 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] belastend@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago

PSA: Losses include dead AND wounded.

[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And they all died because one psychopathic old fart simply just wanted to take over majority of or the entire country of another for personal gain.

[–] bigFab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, but let's keep hating every russian, because they 'freely choose to enlist' and invade other countries. They love being shelled by Nato artillery 🥰

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They didn't freely choose to enlist but if you put a gun in my hand and tell me kill that innocent person I will rather shoot the person giving me the order

[–] te_abstract_art@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think both of you are oversimplifying.

Choice and freedom take on an entirely different meaning when you have a state media bombarding you with anti-Ukraine propaganda 24/7. It's easy for us to say from the sidelines that we'd never get swept up in a war against innocents, but probably a lot of the soldiers have been fully indoctrinated with the idea that Ukraine are a threat to their families. Not to mention they probably now have friends and family who have been killed or wounded in this war.

Putin is the real villain here. He not only started the war, he's the one who has kept it going by his refusal to withdraw troops, silenced political opposition, lied to his population, influenced global politics in his favour by buying elections, and used his subjects as fodder in this pointless war.

It's fucking twisted the amount of suffering one thoroughly evil man can cause.

[–] bigFab@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, now you are oversimplifying world politics to one man's deeds. As if Nato expansionism did not play any role in the creation of this conflict. Read a little history before 2023 and you'll see acquiring Ukraine is been a race between Nato and Russia since at least 2014.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Russia had already invaded in 2014, and successfully got a puppet as president in 2010.

NATO doesn't expand by conquest, countries choose freely to join and other countries (especially hostile ones) don't get to dictate the alliances of their neighbours.

[–] bigFab@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, Nato is such a saint entity who 'freely' bombs Yugoslavia and Libya.

Nato's whole purpose is to deter Russia and will not stop until whole east Europe is pointing missiles at it. Do you believe that's a 'random freely admittance' policy?

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes the whole point of a DEFENSIVE alliance is to defend against a known aggressor, thank you for clarifying

[–] bigFab@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

So you bought the russian bad, american good story? So naive. Look how that ends for Ukraine now.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hey, that's not fair! Most of them were not killed, but only mutilated too much to be ableish-bodied enough for the russian army!

(Serious note: this is the casuality number, that includes deaths, but also soldiers with wounds that put them out of service, like lost legs)

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And then they send the mutilated back out into the trenches literally.

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Armed only with crutches.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

have they looked under the couch?

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Are they stupid? Just find them!

[–] _druid@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You have more in common with those soldiers than you do with the warpigs pulling the strings that led them to their deaths.

[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure everybody on these websites knows they're more similar to enlisted soldiers than to Vladimir Putin.

[–] _druid@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Not everybody, according to some of the comments in this very post.

[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

So... You have a lot of common with people who are ready to go kill in exchange for money?

Oh wowzies.

Also what a damn bad dichotomy: either side with killers for money or those who pay them to kill.

For once, a normal human being will not side with either of.

edit: oh keep them downvotes coming, keep yourself counting all y'all who think killing for money is ok ¯_(ツ)_/¯.

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You mean the 18-30 y/o men who are conscripted into compulsory military service for a year? Kinda sounds like a lot of them might not have much choice, barring gulag or suicide, in the matter.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

tbf, most Russian conscripts are not involved in the war - men sign theoretically voluntary contracts in exchange for extra pay or reduced service time to be deployed outside of Russia.

That being said, there's a great deal of coercion that's involved, so while you can resist pressure to sign a contract, it's not unreasonable to think that a significant minority felt they really didn't have a choice.

[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah welcome to your private fantasy land. Enjoy it.

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just believe the righteous antipathy is better leveled at the Russian government, specifically Putin, than the anonymous cannon fodder.

[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

I prefer to hate everyone willing to kill me, my friends, my family, take over my country equally. Especially so, if they do it for money, for ten years.

Hard to grasp such a complex concept, I understand.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes that number is too low agreed

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Needs more zeroes.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I find this difficult to believe. Edit: Wikipedia has a total (both sides) death toll of 160k-290k.

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

As always that this topic gets discussed: dead and wounded

[–] bigFab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

See first comment, 900K include wounded too.

[–] philpo@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago

Casualties != Death

[–] RymrgandsDaughter@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

How many of those are From NK or are those numbers not counted?

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They throw their young generations into the meat grinder just to control resources. Putin couldn't find a way to pivot to new domestic products so now people get to die.

Fight war, not wars.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

does ukraine actually have resources? russia is gigantic what could they possibly need so badly

[–] Lorindol@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Ukraine has lots of valuable natural resources, but Russia has much more of everything. The biggest reason for the invasion is most likely that Putin could not let a "brother nation" prosper and drift towards Europe and being a functioning democracy.

Russia's population might get wild ideas if they saw that their Ukrainian cousins' standard of living starts to rise rapidly while they have to endure living under a fascist dictator. And substandard and underdeveloped infrastructure, due to the rampant corruption and a government who doesn't give a shit about the areas outside the larger cities.

[–] rrabochiy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

a 10 billion 🙃 stupid propaganda why not?

[–] bingBingBongBong@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago

Not nearly enough, but certainly welcome.