this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Actually Infuriating

519 readers
14 users here now

Community Rules:

Be CivilPlease treat others with decency. No bigotry (disparaging comments about any race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexuality, nationality, ability, age, etc). Personal attacks and bad-faith argumentation are not allowed.

Content should be actually infuriatingPolitics and news are allowed, as well as everyday life. However, please consider posting in partner communities below if it is a better fit.

Mark NSFW/NSFL postsPlease mark anything distressing (death, gore, etc.) as NSFW and clearly label it in the title.

Keep it Legal and MoralNo promoting violence, DOXXing, brigading, harassment, misinformation, spam, etc.

Partner Communities

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
1
The issue the 11th circuit courts could not figure out? Oh just whether or not police should have the ability to raid any house as long as they have a warrant for a house. (ij.org)
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by M0oP0o@mander.xyz to c/actually_infuriating@lemmy.world
0 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I remember reading that the US fought a whole ass revolutionary war over this sort of thing. This has been 7 years of fight for these people.

“When police—including the FBI—raid the wrong house, they must be held responsible for the damages,” said IJ Senior Attorney Anya Bidwell. “The 11th Circuit let the government off the hook in this case, and we are hopeful that the Supreme Court will do the right thing and ensure that Americans can feel secure in their own homes.”

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here