Why would the US need this access for anything aside from trading with other countries?
To move warships rapidly between the two oceans during the world war he's going to start, obviously.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Why would the US need this access for anything aside from trading with other countries?
To move warships rapidly between the two oceans during the world war he's going to start, obviously.
Or so that he can control other countries' trade. He would be the gatekeeper unless ships wanted to take the long route around the Americas.
More mundanely, because the US has bases and shipyards on both coasts.
Have you actually been through the Canal? I have been on a cruise that went through it. It takes hours. That is some slow ass war if I’ve ever heard of one.
Wars are slow
I presume going around South America takes a bit longer.
US Warships already have access. About 40 passages per year.
This from the guy which was harping on about Kamala being a war monger.