this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

17268 readers
713 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Wait bottom mathematican is using j=√-1 instead of i and not the engineer? Because I'm EE gang, and all my homies use j.

[–] GandalfTheDumb@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That part also got me really confused. All the mathematicans I know use i while engineers use i or j depending on the kind of engineer. I've never seen a Pikachu engineer using anything other than j.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago

Pikachu engineer

That's a fucking favorite now. Keeping that in my back pocket.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bisby@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

I agree. Clearly i is current. What is this i=√-1 nonsense.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The fun starts when you study quaternions

i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = ijk = −1

[–] pticrix@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

(...I think you may have gotten whooshed...)

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Hehe, maybe a little, but wanted to share just in case someone didn't know :3

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It gets worse actually. You can define a number system using any power of 2 amount of i-like units in a similar relationship to quaternions using the Cayley-Dickson construction

Fascinatingly, you lose some property of the algebra at each step. Quaternions aren't commutative: ABC != CBA. Octonians aren't associative: (AB)C != A(BC). Once you get into 16 i's with subscripts, it really gets crazy.

(Also, I just got the joke. Damnit @HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone your serious answer threw me off!)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

this isn't real

[–] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 months ago

[Lapsed] mechanical engineering gang checking in. I was also surprised. Though, tbh, I think it came down to personal preference of the professor more than field-wide consensus.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

a real mathematician would use (0, 1) instead of i

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago

I’m a mechanical engineering student with a math minor and I’m a switch so yeah, I’d take either side of this

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 0 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Fake and gay.

No way the engineer corrects the mathematician for using j instead of i.

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

How do we know it's gay though? OP could be a girl (male)

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 0 points 3 months ago

Because it's 4chan. And there are no women on the Internet on 4chan

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago

Sure OP is a girl. Guy In Real Life

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Newfag.

(sorry! seemed like the appropriate 4chan reply)

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago

My thoughts exactly lol

[–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago (6 children)

As an engineer I fully agree. Engineers¹ aren't even able to do basic arithmetics. I even cannot count to 10.

¹ Except maybe Electrical engineers. They seem to be quite smart.

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Electrical engineers are the ones that use j though (because i is used for current)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 months ago

Engineer here, I can definitely count to 10 tho

0 1 10

[–] Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago

The inner machinations of an electrical engineer is too complicated for me to understand, I think they might be thinking on a higher order to understand these circuits

Thats why I barely passed my electrical engineering class lol

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Except maybe Electrical engineers.

Yup, I can count just fine to the 10th number in a zero-indexed counting system: black, brown, red, orange, yellow, green, blue, violet, gray, white.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thomasloven@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

10? That’s the name some put to 1e1, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kogasa@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago (7 children)

The mathematician also used "operative" instead of, uh, something else, and "associative" instead of "commutative"

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 0 points 3 months ago

Relationship goals

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Hum... I don't think the integral "operator" applies by multiplication.

You can put the dx at the beginning of the integral, but not before it.

[–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Nobody on your link is treating the integral "operator" as multiplicative.

dx \int f(x) is blatantly different from \int f(x) dx

[–] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If you were using nonstandard analysis with dx an infinitesimal you could put it outside I guess. Maybe with differential forms too?

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Switch it with a summation operator and see if it makes sense. The problem isn't the operation by itself, but the fact that the operator implies an argument application, like a function.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Well done, truly

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Physicist behavior

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Why are we still visiting literal pro-Nazi websites?

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Didn't realize you had to be a nazi in order to post on 4chan.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

If you are unaware of 4chan being a tool to push people towards fascism, you seriously need to do some more reading and learning. It is an explicit goal of the platform. Here is a random example of an article you can read. Wikipedia is also full of good information.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] match@pawb.social 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

4chan is a largely fascist website but that doesn't mean every single screenshot is fascist or does something to promote it

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It normalizes their behavior instead of shunning it. Remember: If there’s one Nazi at the bar who hasn’t been kicked out, you’re at a Nazi bar.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Gods I wish I had a top to troll like this

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Imagine a top that isn't math brained, giving you so much more opportunities to troll before they find out...and then when they do learn something you have been trolling them....

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is the kind of brat I can get behind. 😏

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago
[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 0 points 3 months ago (6 children)

As a physicist I can't understand why would anyone complain about a +jb or $\int dx f(x)$. Probably because we don't fuck

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 0 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Me, a language/arts person: "Huh?"

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think rather d/dx is the operator. You apply it to an expression to bind free occurrences of x in that expression. For example, dx²/dx is best understood as d/dx (x²). The notation would be clear if you implement calculus in a program.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›