this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

15764 readers
333 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

Wait bottom mathematican is using j=√-1 instead of i and not the engineer? Because I'm EE gang, and all my homies use j.

[–] GandalfTheDumb@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

That part also got me really confused. All the mathematicans I know use i while engineers use i or j depending on the kind of engineer. I've never seen a Pikachu engineer using anything other than j.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 16 hours ago

Pikachu engineer

That's a fucking favorite now. Keeping that in my back pocket.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bisby@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago

I agree. Clearly i is current. What is this i=√-1 nonsense.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The fun starts when you study quaternions

i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = ijk = −1

[–] pticrix@lemmy.ca 0 points 14 hours ago (3 children)
[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

(...I think you may have gotten whooshed...)

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Hehe, maybe a little, but wanted to share just in case someone didn't know :3

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

It gets worse actually. You can define a number system using any power of 2 amount of i-like units in a similar relationship to quaternions using the Cayley-Dickson construction

Fascinatingly, you lose some property of the algebra at each step. Quaternions aren't commutative: ABC != CBA. Octonians aren't associative: (AB)C != A(BC). Once you get into 16 i's with subscripts, it really gets crazy.

(Also, I just got the joke. Damnit @HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone your serious answer threw me off!)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago

this isn't real

[–] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 17 hours ago

[Lapsed] mechanical engineering gang checking in. I was also surprised. Though, tbh, I think it came down to personal preference of the professor more than field-wide consensus.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago

a real mathematician would use (0, 1) instead of i

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 17 hours ago

I’m a mechanical engineering student with a math minor and I’m a switch so yeah, I’d take either side of this

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 0 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

Fake and gay.

No way the engineer corrects the mathematician for using j instead of i.

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 0 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

How do we know it's gay though? OP could be a girl (male)

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 0 points 16 hours ago

Because it's 4chan. And there are no women on the Internet on 4chan

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 15 hours ago

Sure OP is a girl. Guy In Real Life

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago

Newfag.

(sorry! seemed like the appropriate 4chan reply)

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 16 hours ago

My thoughts exactly lol

[–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

As an engineer I fully agree. Engineers¹ aren't even able to do basic arithmetics. I even cannot count to 10.

¹ Except maybe Electrical engineers. They seem to be quite smart.

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 0 points 14 hours ago

Electrical engineers are the ones that use j though (because i is used for current)

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 0 points 13 hours ago

Engineer here, I can definitely count to 10 tho

0 1 10

[–] Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 12 hours ago

The inner machinations of an electrical engineer is too complicated for me to understand, I think they might be thinking on a higher order to understand these circuits

Thats why I barely passed my electrical engineering class lol

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Except maybe Electrical engineers.

Yup, I can count just fine to the 10th number in a zero-indexed counting system: black, brown, red, orange, yellow, green, blue, violet, gray, white.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thomasloven@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago

10? That’s the name some put to 1e1, right?

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The mathematician also used "operative" instead of, uh, something else, and "associative" instead of "commutative"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 0 points 15 hours ago

Relationship goals

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 0 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Hum... I don't think the integral "operator" applies by multiplication.

You can put the dx at the beginning of the integral, but not before it.

[–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Nobody on your link is treating the integral "operator" as multiplicative.

dx \int f(x) is blatantly different from \int f(x) dx

[–] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

If you were using nonstandard analysis with dx an infinitesimal you could put it outside I guess. Maybe with differential forms too?

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago

Switch it with a summation operator and see if it makes sense. The problem isn't the operation by itself, but the fact that the operator implies an argument application, like a function.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago

Well done, truly

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 0 points 15 hours ago

Physicist behavior

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Why are we still visiting literal pro-Nazi websites?

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't realize you had to be a nazi in order to post on 4chan.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If you are unaware of 4chan being a tool to push people towards fascism, you seriously need to do some more reading and learning. It is an explicit goal of the platform. Here is a random example of an article you can read. Wikipedia is also full of good information.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] match@pawb.social 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

4chan is a largely fascist website but that doesn't mean every single screenshot is fascist or does something to promote it

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It normalizes their behavior instead of shunning it. Remember: If there’s one Nazi at the bar who hasn’t been kicked out, you’re at a Nazi bar.

[–] match@pawb.social 0 points 11 hours ago

There is a nazi at the bar (4chan) but also there's a gay couple at the bar (the OOP). the gay couple leaves that bar and goes to another bar (Lemmy). is the second bar and its bargoers now also Nazis?

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Gods I wish I had a top to troll like this

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Imagine a top that isn't math brained, giving you so much more opportunities to troll before they find out...and then when they do learn something you have been trolling them....

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This is the kind of brat I can get behind. 😏

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago
[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 0 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

As a physicist I can't understand why would anyone complain about a +jb or $\int dx f(x)$. Probably because we don't fuck

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 0 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Me, a language/arts person: "Huh?"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I think rather d/dx is the operator. You apply it to an expression to bind free occurrences of x in that expression. For example, dx²/dx is best understood as d/dx (x²). The notation would be clear if you implement calculus in a program.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›