this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16624 readers
32 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Wait bottom mathematican is using j=√-1 instead of i and not the engineer? Because I'm EE gang, and all my homies use j.

[–] GandalfTheDumb@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That part also got me really confused. All the mathematicans I know use i while engineers use i or j depending on the kind of engineer. I've never seen a Pikachu engineer using anything other than j.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

Pikachu engineer

That's a fucking favorite now. Keeping that in my back pocket.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bisby@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I agree. Clearly i is current. What is this i=√-1 nonsense.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The fun starts when you study quaternions

i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = ijk = −1

[–] pticrix@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

(...I think you may have gotten whooshed...)

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hehe, maybe a little, but wanted to share just in case someone didn't know :3

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It gets worse actually. You can define a number system using any power of 2 amount of i-like units in a similar relationship to quaternions using the Cayley-Dickson construction

Fascinatingly, you lose some property of the algebra at each step. Quaternions aren't commutative: ABC != CBA. Octonians aren't associative: (AB)C != A(BC). Once you get into 16 i's with subscripts, it really gets crazy.

(Also, I just got the joke. Damnit @HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone your serious answer threw me off!)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

this isn't real

[–] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 month ago

[Lapsed] mechanical engineering gang checking in. I was also surprised. Though, tbh, I think it came down to personal preference of the professor more than field-wide consensus.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

a real mathematician would use (0, 1) instead of i

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m a mechanical engineering student with a math minor and I’m a switch so yeah, I’d take either side of this

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 0 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Fake and gay.

No way the engineer corrects the mathematician for using j instead of i.

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

How do we know it's gay though? OP could be a girl (male)

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago

Because it's 4chan. And there are no women on the Internet on 4chan

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

Sure OP is a girl. Guy In Real Life

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Newfag.

(sorry! seemed like the appropriate 4chan reply)

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 month ago

My thoughts exactly lol

[–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 month ago (6 children)

As an engineer I fully agree. Engineers¹ aren't even able to do basic arithmetics. I even cannot count to 10.

¹ Except maybe Electrical engineers. They seem to be quite smart.

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Electrical engineers are the ones that use j though (because i is used for current)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 month ago

Engineer here, I can definitely count to 10 tho

0 1 10

[–] Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago

The inner machinations of an electrical engineer is too complicated for me to understand, I think they might be thinking on a higher order to understand these circuits

Thats why I barely passed my electrical engineering class lol

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Except maybe Electrical engineers.

Yup, I can count just fine to the 10th number in a zero-indexed counting system: black, brown, red, orange, yellow, green, blue, violet, gray, white.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thomasloven@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

10? That’s the name some put to 1e1, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kogasa@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago (7 children)

The mathematician also used "operative" instead of, uh, something else, and "associative" instead of "commutative"

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 0 points 1 month ago

Relationship goals

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hum... I don't think the integral "operator" applies by multiplication.

You can put the dx at the beginning of the integral, but not before it.

[–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nobody on your link is treating the integral "operator" as multiplicative.

dx \int f(x) is blatantly different from \int f(x) dx

[–] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If you were using nonstandard analysis with dx an infinitesimal you could put it outside I guess. Maybe with differential forms too?

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Switch it with a summation operator and see if it makes sense. The problem isn't the operation by itself, but the fact that the operator implies an argument application, like a function.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Well done, truly

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Physicist behavior

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why are we still visiting literal pro-Nazi websites?

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Didn't realize you had to be a nazi in order to post on 4chan.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

If you are unaware of 4chan being a tool to push people towards fascism, you seriously need to do some more reading and learning. It is an explicit goal of the platform. Here is a random example of an article you can read. Wikipedia is also full of good information.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] match@pawb.social 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

4chan is a largely fascist website but that doesn't mean every single screenshot is fascist or does something to promote it

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It normalizes their behavior instead of shunning it. Remember: If there’s one Nazi at the bar who hasn’t been kicked out, you’re at a Nazi bar.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Gods I wish I had a top to troll like this

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Imagine a top that isn't math brained, giving you so much more opportunities to troll before they find out...and then when they do learn something you have been trolling them....

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is the kind of brat I can get behind. 😏

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago
[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 0 points 1 month ago (6 children)

As a physicist I can't understand why would anyone complain about a +jb or $\int dx f(x)$. Probably because we don't fuck

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Me, a language/arts person: "Huh?"

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think rather d/dx is the operator. You apply it to an expression to bind free occurrences of x in that expression. For example, dx²/dx is best understood as d/dx (x²). The notation would be clear if you implement calculus in a program.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›