this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
64 points (81.4% liked)

science

20167 readers
143 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] borf@lemmynsfw.com 71 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm not gonna even click, that headline is some incredibly bad pop sci

[–] UnderFreyja@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only thing missing from it is some mention of AI

[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago

"AI powered battery reverses entropy with the help of quantum teleportation!"

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I know it's an awful headline. I'd still be interested in what people think of the content, because there's something legit in there it seems, but this article (which is published on a number of websites and may be a fairly unedited press release) doesn't explain much. The headline writers seem to see the word "battery" and run with that, even though it's misleading.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I went ahead and read the article. I know a bit about quantum computing. Here’s my summary of it:

Entanglement is a useful resource for quantum networking, enabling things like quantum-secure communication and distributed quantum computing.

TLDR The paper describes algorithms to more efficiently create a form of entanglement that’s useful from the error-prone “dirty” entanglement you get from entanglement-generating hardware.

When you make entanglement, it often doesn’t come out perfect, and you need a technique to “distill” “good” entangled states out of a collection of “dirty” entangled states.

The typical “rules” for this involve two parties that create dirty shared entanglement (shared entanglement means a pair of entangled qubits, but each party has one of the qubits). They can then do whatever they like with their qubits individually and can communicate (over classical channels e.g. the internet) but they can’t do anything “quantum” between the two of them.

This paper analyzes the case where there is a 3rd party that follows these same rules but has been previously set up as an “entanglement battery”, which means preparing it in a special state from which entanglement can be “borrowed” or “returned” to the battery using only local operations and classical communication.

In particular it’s looking for “reversible” (meaning no loss in total entanglement over the process) “entanglement manipulation” (changing the entanglement from one form into another, presumably more useful form). It goes into a lot of analysis as to what the limits on this process are, and makes analogies to how engines work in thermodynamics.

[–] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Thanks for this :-)

[–] subignition@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

So, this magazine isn't one of the ones that has a hard prohibition on rephrasing headlines, from what I can tell.

You could simply edit the title to better reflect the actual content of the article.

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Ya how far off are we from energon cubes at this point

[–] captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wake me up when they can rip through spacetime and find me an alternate reality where I’m not so tired.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

An alternative reality where I'm

~~rich~~ ✖️

~~sexy~~ ✖️

~~famous~~ ✖️

not tired ✔️

I like your confidence.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"reverse entanglement" ... I don't think those words mean what you think those words mean...

[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

is it when two long streamy bodies of water run into each other?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago
[–] Auth@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago
[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Big battery will never let this see the light

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 1 day ago

folks downvoting you seem to be in a vacuum 😆