this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
61 points (95.5% liked)

Canada

10101 readers
973 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not like it's an existential threat or anything. Besides, we can just use the military to shoot at the climate until it cooperates. /s

[–] cyborganism@piefed.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Fire "fighters" are now using semi-automatic rifles to put out forest fires by shooting at the flames.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just like provinces and municipalities.

"No money for education, healthcare, or bike lanes."

Also, "We're spending countless tens of millions to widen a road so that people can sit in traffic for 30 seconds less than before while making it less safe for all other road users! Vote for us again, plz."

[–] Subscript5676@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You missed an important word for the part about traffic

… can sit in traffic for 30 seconds less than before (temporarily) …

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Until induced demand kicks in, then you'll be with the other idle motorists for an extra 4 minutes! LOL

[–] cyborganism@piefed.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We're also giving billions in corporate subsidies. We finance their development and they get to keep the rewards.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Frustratingly, this is how corporations do business just about anywhere in the world. Why bother subsidizing at all? Either make it publicly owned or tell them that they are on their own. Viable businesses will succeed without handouts.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nope, we're all going to hell, on Earth.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=12Ch-NIYxvQ

Oops, turns out the SMOC, the Antarctic counterpart to the AMOC... yeah looks like it broke and flipped about a decade ago.

So, that means the global thermohaline circulation system is in fact currently collapsing, heat transfer flows in the worlds oceans are going to do increasingly unpredictable wild shit, which will cause increasingly unpredictable large scale weather patterns...

Oh! And because this fucks up the salinity and nutrient concentrations of uh, ocean water basically everywhere...

I guess the Dolphins will soon be boarding their ships along to 'So long and thanks for all the fish!'.

[–] Binturong@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Merge them. Create the climate corps and allocate federal funding to that branch of military operation, that's how you actually get funding, and it makes sense because climate shift is a security threat as much as anything else. Also, given how shit is turning south of the border, this is the most comfortable I've ever been with more military spending. I'm just saying this doesn't have to be an either-or dichotomy.

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They want you to use public transport but increase prices while the service degrade

[–] cyborganism@piefed.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They increase the price and decrease the frequency or have trouble maintaining their infrastructure because of government financial cuts to said public transport services.

Get your head outta your butt.

[–] teppa@piefed.ca 0 points 1 day ago

The problem with climate is we would need to stop doing mass immigration from low emission countries which raises the cost of borrowing. We would need to cut off imports from emerging markets, so the cost of goods would rise and we would have higher interest rates, crashing our housing bubble.

We are entrenched with climate change because our borrowing cost is tied to cheap goods produced using coal by wage slaves in areas with the lowest worker rights.