this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
178 points (97.3% liked)

Uplifting News

15790 readers
305 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/39964313

Some key insights from the article:

collapsed inline media

collapsed inline media

collapsed inline media

collapsed inline media

collapsed inline media

Basically, what they did was to look at how much batteries would be needed in a given area to provide constant power supply at least 97% of the time, and the calculate the costs of that solar+battery setup compared to coal and nuclear.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

We're getting there!

What about winter in Sweden, for example?

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hydroelectric go brrrrrrrr

I think that's what they use mostly.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 4 points 1 day ago

Yes, hydroelectric is the primary source. Nuclear is still number 2, however.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

I'm in Canada with solar, and I was thinking of supplementing with a wind turbine, as the snow and short days have a much less of an effect on output.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

they still get a bit of sun in winters. however, off shore wind parks and energy trading with neighbours should easily fill the gap

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

Molten calcium batteries could be fine for long term storage like that. You’ll still need a ridiculous surface area for the panels though.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

From what I can tell, without. Looks like they used the Lazard LCOE+ standard metric which doesn’t factor in government subsidies.