this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
107 points (96.5% liked)

science

19976 readers
237 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 27 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

For at least six decades, neuroscientists have been arguing over a big, foundational question: Do adult brains make new neurons? This process of “neurogenesis” had been shown in other adult animals, but its evidence in humans was circumstantial—until now.

Bullshit...

We've known since the 90s because of cancer drugs.

Autopsies of people who received certain kinds of treatment showed neurogenesis because some braincells included certain isotopes that couldn't have been present in the body before treatment.

This is the first I've ever heard there was a "controversy" about it.

Fo fucks sake, we've known multiple ways to make it happen for years.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31178678/

[–] Zippygutterslug@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago

I remember in DARE (drug abuse resistance education) in middle school cops would preach on the (false) point that "you only have so many brain cells," and that any and all drug use caused "permanent, irreversible," brain damage.

God I hate cops.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 11 points 11 hours ago

That's science reporting for you.