this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
93 points (94.3% liked)

politics

24578 readers
2431 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

218 to 214. Republicans could afford to lose 3 votes, they lost 2.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/house-vote-big-beautiful-bill-rules-committee/

"Reps. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania."

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Major win for Trump as Congress passes 'big, beautiful bill'

And a major loss for the rest of US...

We will be sicker, poorer, have less rights, have less freedoms, have less opportunities... And probably some other things I haven't yet thought of...

All to make the New Age Robber Barons even more obscenely and immorally wealthy.

🤡 🖕 💩 💩

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Silver lining?

You're more likely to reach the revolution part of the history cycle faster, and reset the wheel for future generations to also fuck up.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This empire is going to take a few generations to fall. Doubt I'll see a revolution in my life time, but maybe my kids will get to see that silver lining.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

Unless you're really old, I wouldn't bet too hard on that. Things tend to happen quickly once they reach a tipping point.

The Arab spring revolutions were not even two years long and a dozen countries countries with 4 rulers being deposed.

I would absolutely bet money that before I die in 30-40 years the US will have fewer states than it currently does.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago (3 children)

ICE has 3x the budget of the marines with this bill.

I hate this timeline.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

What country has ever failed by spending lavishly on secret police? Oh like most of them that try? Ahh I'm sure it'll work out this time.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only ice I want to fund is cube.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Are we still blaming Harambe? Feels accurate.

[–] Karrion409@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Whatever dude I give up. I'm taking the accelerationist approach now. Let them crash the fucking country because it's the only way people will have even a tiny chance of learning from this. We've become too comfortable which has lead to complacency and the only way things will improve is if people experience a massive quality of life decrease under this regime.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's going to be really bad this time, and I was watching the talking heads on the news discounting the CBO report by saying "Naw, naw, it's cool... see it's going to cause economic growth... everything is going to be fine!"

And I'm like "That's a lie, and it was a lie when Reagan said it 45 years ago. It's NEVER ONCE worked out that way."

But nobody in the media is willing to follow up with that question: "So why didn't the growth happen all the other times we tried this?"

[–] Karrion409@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Our media is uniquely dog shit. It's one of the problems with having literally fucking everything owned by corporations. If we ever get power again we need to prioritize making shit like fox illegal.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 5 points 13 hours ago

Working as designed. This is the result of media consolidation combined with repealing the fairness doctrine (also a Reaganism).

Now all of the major media outlets are owned by a handful of billionaires and they are allowed, if not encouraged, to bend your opinion to their will.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Burn baby burn. Pedal to the metal.

[–] Karrion409@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Thats where I'm at with things. I tried to have hope that we could fix things normally but it's just not possible. If things don't go downhill fast we're gonna get trump or vance being inaugurated in 2029.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm losing hope for the future. They're selling merchandise for the fucking concentration camp. Humanity has failed. I almost hope we go extinct, we fucking deserve it

[–] Karrion409@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

We're witnessing the capitalist version of a runaway diesel engine. It may go really fast but eventually its gonna explode and brother we are close to the explosion.

[–] echo@lemmings.world 20 points 1 day ago

Fucking treason weasels

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

Just got this email, waiting for the "leopards eating faces" moment:

From: subscription.service@subscriptions.ssa.gov

"Social Security Applauds Passage of Legislation Providing Historic Tax Relief for Seniors

The Social Security Administration (SSA) is celebrating the passage of the One Big, Beautiful Bill, a landmark piece of legislation that delivers long-awaited tax relief to millions of older Americans.

The bill ensures that nearly 90% of Social Security beneficiaries will no longer pay federal income taxes on their benefits, providing meaningful and immediate relief to seniors who have spent a lifetime contributing to our nation's economy.

“This is a historic step forward for America’s seniors,” said Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano. “For nearly 90 years, Social Security has been a cornerstone of economic security for older Americans. By significantly reducing the tax burden on benefits, this legislation reaffirms President Trump’s promise to protect Social Security and helps ensure that seniors can better enjoy the retirement they’ve earned."

The new law includes a provision that eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for most beneficiaries, providing relief to individuals and couples. Additionally, it provides an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older, ensuring that retirees can keep more of what they have earned.

Social Security remains committed to providing timely, accurate information to the public and will continue working closely with federal partners to ensure beneficiaries understand how this legislation may affect them."

[–] selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

🖕🤬🖕

I hope MAGAts and those who didn't vote a really fucking miserable "independence day"