Look it is so simple, it just acts on an infinite dimensional vector space of differentiable functions.
Science Memes
Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!
A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.
Rules
- Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
- Keep it rooted (on topic).
- No spam.
- Infographics welcome, get schooled.
This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.
Research Committee
Other Mander Communities
Science and Research
Biology and Life Sciences
- !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
- !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
- !anthropology@mander.xyz
- !arachnology@mander.xyz
- !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
- !biodiversity@mander.xyz
- !biology@mander.xyz
- !biophysics@mander.xyz
- !botany@mander.xyz
- !ecology@mander.xyz
- !entomology@mander.xyz
- !fermentation@mander.xyz
- !herpetology@mander.xyz
- !houseplants@mander.xyz
- !medicine@mander.xyz
- !microscopy@mander.xyz
- !mycology@mander.xyz
- !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
- !nutrition@mander.xyz
- !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
- !palaeontology@mander.xyz
- !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
- !plantid@mander.xyz
- !plants@mander.xyz
- !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz
Physical Sciences
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !chemistry@mander.xyz
- !earthscience@mander.xyz
- !geography@mander.xyz
- !geospatial@mander.xyz
- !nuclear@mander.xyz
- !physics@mander.xyz
- !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
- !spectroscopy@mander.xyz
Humanities and Social Sciences
Practical and Applied Sciences
- !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
- !gardening@mander.xyz
- !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
- !soilscience@slrpnk.net
- !terrariums@mander.xyz
- !timelapse@mander.xyz
Memes
Miscellaneous
Mathematicians will in one breath tell you in one breath tell you they aren't fractions, then in the next tell you dz/dx = dz/dy * dy/dx
Have you seen a mathematician claim that? Because there's entire algebra they created just so it becomes a fraction.
Brah, chain rule & function composition.
(d/dx)(x) = 1 = dx/dx
I found math in physics to have this really fun duality of "these are rigorous rules that must be followed" and "if we make a set of edge case assumptions, we can fit the square peg in the round hole"
Also I will always treat the derivative operator as a fraction
2+2 = 5
…for sufficiently large values of 2
i was in a math class once where a physics major treated a particular variable as one because at csmic scale the value of the variable basically doesn't matter. the math professor both was and wasn't amused
Engineer. 2+2=5+/-1
Statistician: 1+1=sqrt(2)
Computer science: 2+2=4 (for integers at least; try this with floating point numbers at your own peril, you absolute fool)
0.1 + 0.2 = 0.30000000000000004
pi*pi = g
I mean as an engineer, this should actually be 2+2=4 +/-1.
I always chafed at that.
"Here are these rigid rules you must use and follow."
"How did we get these rules?"
"By ignoring others."
It's not even a fraction, you can just cancel out the two "d"s
"d"s nuts lmao
Derivatives started making more sense to me after I started learning their practical applications in physics class. d/dx
was too abstract when learning it in precalc, but once physics introduced d/dt
(change with respect to time t), it made derivative formulas feel more intuitive, like "velocity is the change in position with respect to time, which the derivative of position" and "acceleration is the change in velocity with respect to time, which is the derivative of velocity"
Possibly you just had to hear it more than once.
I learned it the other way around since my physics teacher was speedrunning the math sections to get to the fun physics stuff and I really got it after hearing it the second time in math class.
But yeah: it often helps to have practical examples and it doesn't get any more applicable to real life than d/dt.
Little dicky? Dick Feynman?
Except you can kinda treat it as a fraction when dealing with differential equations
Oh god this comment just gave me ptsd
Only for separable equations
Is that Phill Swift from flex tape ?
De dix, boss! De dix!
It was a fraction in Leibniz’s original notation.
And it denotes an operation that gives you that fraction in operational algebra...
Instead of making it clear that d
is an operator, not a value, and thus the entire thing becomes an operator, physicists keep claiming that there's no fraction involved. I guess they like confusing people.
Division is an operator
Why does using it as a fraction work just fine then?
It doesn't. Only sometimes it does, because it can be seen as an operator involving a limit of a fraction and sometimes you can commute the limit when the expression is sufficiently regular
What is Phil Swift going to do with that chicken?
The will repair it with flex seal of course
To demonstrate the power of flex seal, I SAWED THIS CHICKEN IN HALF!
clearly, d/dx simplifies to 1/x
I still don't know how I made it through those math curses at uni.
If not fraction, why fraction shaped?
Having studied physics myself I'm sure physicists know what a derivative looks like.
1/2 <-- not a number. Two numbers and an operator. But also a number.
The thing is that it's legit a fraction and d/dx actually explains what's going on under the hood. People interact with it as an operator because it's mostly looking up common derivatives and using the properties.
Take for example ∫f(x) dx
to mean "the sum (∫) of supersmall sections of x (dx) multiplied by the value of x at that point ( f(x) ). This is why there's dx at the end of all integrals.
The same way you can say that the slope at x is tiny f(x) divided by tiny x or d*f(x) / dx
or more traditionally (d/dx) * f(x)
.
The other thing is that it's legit not a fraction.