this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
43 points (95.7% liked)

Canada

10051 readers
693 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 40 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Boy, the moment this guy didn't have an election to win he tied those elbows right to his sides, huh?

[–] cyborganism@piefed.ca 36 points 3 days ago

The tax was announced in 2020, but the legislation to enact it didn't pass until last year. While it has been in effect for a year, the first payment, retroactive to 2022, was to be submitted on June 30.

The government intended it to overcome what Canada saw as a tax loophole, with big tech companies operating in Canada digitally, making money off Canadian users and data, but not paying tax on it in Canada.

The tax was to apply to companies that operate online marketplaces, online advertising services and social media platforms, and those that earn revenue from some sales of user data.

It meant companies such as Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber and Airbnb, would pay a three-per-cent levy on revenue from Canadian users.

The tax was only to cover large companies, those that have worldwide annual revenues greater than 750 million euros per year and Canadian digital services revenue greater than $20 million per year. The parliamentary budget officer had estimated it would bring in $7.2 billion over five years.

That seemed fair. He cancelled it to appease Trump, clearly. This is extremely disappointing. And we're also losing $7.2 billion in revenue over 5 years. This could have helped fund Canadian cultural projects, artists, or finance our struggling media industry.

[–] xyro@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 days ago

This make us look desperate, this is disappointing

[–] justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because Carney is a fucking traitor.

If he hasn't surrendered on the DST, the wealthy tax or the global minimum tax rate, he wouldn't have had to cut anything to increase the military budget.

I dread to see what he surrenders to the US in his trade "deal".

[–] grey_maniac@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Surrenders to the US, or to the demands of Canadian billionaires and corporations? We have our own oligarch and monopolist issues, they're just slightly quieter about it. At least we have fewer religious nutbars, but they do try.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

This. The DTS was not a tax on American or foreign digital services, but all of them. Home grown digital services companies were certainly lobbying to get this killed, too.

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago

Ok. This Canadian just cancelled his digital services.

[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

So about that military budget.