this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
42 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3129 readers
981 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aramis87@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So, question: my cousin had a leaking pipe under his house and they ran one of those pipe lines things through it to fix it. Why can't we run pipe liner through the lead pipes to at least reduce the exposure? And even if there's some reason it couldn't be done on some of the lines, surely it could be done on others?

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

there are many economical and technical issues,

for starters, they don't care if you or your children are exposed to toxic chemicals in the drinking water.

also, it'll cost money (an insignificant fraction of the cost of the damages) but damages are free, so they don't care.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Especially with republicans fighting it every step of the way.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Chicago is known as a democrat stronghold. The republicans don't have power to fight anything there.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

The federal government could attempt to do so.

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

American trully lead in water quality