this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
177 points (98.4% liked)

World News

48103 readers
2026 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Note that the outcome of the underlying case, which is about the future of the Murdoch media empire (i.e. whether control over it will fall exclusively to conservative Lachlan Murdoch or be evenly split among all four heirs, of whom three are comparatively liberal), will be extremely consequential for both media and politics on a global scale.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Burn it all to the ground, kids.

[–] foiledAgain@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Greg has entered the chat

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Fascinating - so he changed the trust to grant all power to the eldest son but other kids ain't happy and the details are sealed so makes you wonder what spicy shit is in there. This is some evil empire drama.

The push is coming from a coalition of other big media sources and this "Our Nevada Judges" (ONJ) non-profit which basically all they do is civic action against sealed material - what a cool organization!

[–] Novocirab@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The Atlantic article that I linked in the post description talks at length about the spicy shit (especially about the family relations and only comparatively little about the legal aspects).

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Fuck this dude with a rusty spade. He's a monster, so bad that even his extreme old age doesn't temper my hate.

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did you think the show was based on something else?

[–] Novocirab@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The most staggering thing though is that the show has had quite noticeable repercussions on the dealings of the real-life Murdochs. Anyone who would like a long read on all this can check out the Atlantic article linked in the post description.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

Rupert, for his part, seemed to resent his son for what he saw as a preoccupation with respectability

Lol pretty much sums up Rupert right there. Thanks for the read

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Rupert Murdoch should have been executed long ago and Fox "News" sold off with the proceeds going to all the people whose lives his abomination and its lies have ruined.

Ngl it would be the height of comedy if Fox did an ideological about-face

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

May they tear up each other in court.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For some reason I thought this was an australian court thing. was unaware it was going on in the us.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

It will turn out that the corporation exists in Nevada due to some sort of tax break years ago.

[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What legal ground do they have to stand on?

“I want to revoke an irrevocable trust because the recipients aren’t conservative?”

[–] Novocirab@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

There's a provision that says the trust structure can be changed without everyone's consent if the intended change is in the interest of all trustees. Rupert, Lachlan and their team want to exploit this by arguing that the ongoing financial success of the media empire is dependent on it retaining its staunchly conservative editorial line, so that it is in fact (from a financial point of view) in the interest of the three non-conservative children if they don't get to have any influence. The first judge wasn't buying it; let's hope that the others will rule the same way. (One argument in their favor is that the $787 million settlement that Fox News has to pay to Dominion Voting System due to a defamation lawsuit was a consequence of Rupert's or Lachlan's die-hard conservative messaging.)

What's less good: I remember dimly that, should Rupert live long enough (past theö year 2030?), he can change the trust at will again.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Wow sometimes I see something and am just struck by how America is a Mammonite theocracy