this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
43 points (97.8% liked)

Canada

9939 readers
692 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmyng@lemmy.ca 45 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

In other words: "If we can't lie to people about our environmental efforts then we're not even going to try to lie."

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

And that's good.

[–] Davriellelouna@lemmy.world 36 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I'm not a Canadian citizen. I studied in Quebec before moving back to my country. I love Canada and I follow Canadian politics very closely.

Justin Trudeau has done some disappointing things. Bill C-59 is not one of them.

In fact, I believe Bill C-59 is perhaps the single greatest bill adopted under Justin Trudeau's government.

This bill gives enormous new powers to the Competition Bureau:

https://competition-bureau.canada.ca/en/how-we-foster-competition/education-and-outreach/guide-june-2024-amendments-competition-act

https://theconversation.com/canadas-competition-laws-just-changed-heres-what-you-need-to-know-220020

This bill also allows the Competition Bureau to punish companies that knowingly lie about their environmental record:

https://ccli.ubc.ca/bill-c-59-anti-greenwashing/

https://www.torys.com/our-latest-thinking/publications/2024/06/competition-act-amendments-require-companies-to-back-up-environmental-claims

Here is a funny thing that happened. A few hours before Bill C-59 was set to pass, some oil companies started deleting content from their website:

Pathways Alliance, a coalition of Canadian tar sands producers aiming to build a massive carbon capture project in Alberta, scrubbed their website of its content June 19.

In its place is a notice indicating the organization “removed content from our website, social media and other public communications” and that they had done so in response to anticipated changes coming with Bill C-59.

https://www.desmog.com/2024/06/20/pathways-alliance-website-scrubbed-ahead-of-new-greenwashing-law/

It's just outrageous to see Danielle Smith and these CEOs whine like that.

If you don't break the law by knowingly lying, you have nothing to fear.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 18 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, it's clear why they're unhappy about it. What's the point of pretending to take action if you can't then lie about what a great job you did?

[–] Bo7a@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 hours ago

This is not intended to disparage you, OP.

Fuck every CEO, and every fucking lie that comes out of their stupid shit dripping mouths.

If a CEO complains about something, I immediately think that I will probably support that thing.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I can understand why this would deter companies from advertising their environmental initiatives, but it kinda sad (though entirely expected) that it turns out they were only doing for the good PR. Guess this means we need to start introducing some environmental legislation with teeth.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 hours ago

b-b-b-but the economyyyyyyyyyyyy

-some corporate shill probably

[–] thehowlingnorth@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 hour ago

But... If they're green washing, they weren't doing shit anyway.

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 hours ago

Is that the low-emissions one that bad actors keep pretending is a "production cap", despite oil production currently being higher then ever?