this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
89 points (88.7% liked)

Technology

71415 readers
3592 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Apple and Google app stores continue to offer private browsing apps that are surreptitiously owned by Chinese companies, more than six weeks after they were identified in a Tech Transparency Project report. Apple and Google may also be profiting from these apps, which put Americans’ privacy and U.S. national security at risk, TTP found.

The apps are virtual private networks (VPNs), which promise to mask a user’s identity as they browse the internet. But Chinese-owned VPNs raise serious privacy and security concerns for Americans because Chinese companies can be forced to share user data with the Chinese government under the country’s national security laws. VPNs have access to particularly sensitive user data since they see all of a person’s web activity.

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] febra@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As someone living in Europe I'm more concerned with American companies harvesting my data.

[–] percent@infosec.pub -1 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Just curious: Why would you prefer your data to be harvested in China vs. the US?

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

thats not what they said did they? they said they are more concerned about American companies harvesting their data as they live in Europe and don't have as much affinity to China.

[–] percent@infosec.pub 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

thats not what they said did they?

Is it not? They said they're "more concerned" with American companies harvesting data. Doesn't that mean that, given the choice between the US and China harvesting their data, they'd choose China because it concerns them less? Did I misunderstand it?

they said they are more concerned about American companies harvesting their data as they live in Europe and don’t have as much affinity to China.

Actually, they didn't say this part:

and don’t have as much affinity to China.

They answered my question with a more specific explanation though, and now I understand. In their position, I'd probably choose China too.

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

Sure yeah I could be wrong. If America scares them more than China it's a major turning point because they are European.

What I initially got from their comment: They are more concerned about actually real threats in their life like Google, Meta, or Apple which are American and are probably what they are using at work and outside of work given they live in Europe. They are less concerned about china because they don't use chinese phones daily or hangout in weChat (I hope).

Where I can of course be wrong about this: They are actually using Tiktok and don't care about the possible spying. They could be using chinese tech and simply not know. main concern is if they are on some tech stack at work or their ISP has equipment from chinese companies known to phone home.

[–] febra@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Because China doesn't have as much influence in Europe as the US does. Besides that, there's a higher chance of US companies sharing data with European governments than Chinese companies doing so.

[–] percent@infosec.pub 1 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 34 minutes ago)

Ah, thanks for the explanation. That totally makes sense. If forced to choose a foreign entity to harvest my data, I'd prefer the one least likely to share my data with my government too.

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't use sketchy VPN apps, at all. The fact that they're Chinese owned is irrelevant.

[–] a1studmuffin@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago

Honestly, I wouldn't trust most commercial VPNs these days, especially the ones that are nearly always on 100% discount sales. If they're not making their revenue from customers, they must be making it some other way. And that's a mighty fine data set they're sitting on.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

So, trust your VPN service. Makes sense.

[–] mke@programming.dev 15 points 1 day ago

About as much as I trust the yanks.

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

it can’t be worse that what DOGE has done.

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 hours ago

Who cares if China has your data?

If you give your data to America, you’re definitely going into the Palantir AI tech so you can get drone striked in your bedroom for not jerking off to your Donald Trump pic for the correct number of strokes.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

you can move onto proxies, or even host your own, but thats going to cost money.(yea thats what the of ACCOUNTS, AND LINK FARMING accts use on reddit these days). VPn is way to compromised and abused already.

Sincerely, what is China going to do with it? Open a Chinese bank account in my name? If any institution in the us accepts account openings from a chinese or vpn ip address then it cant be trustworthy enough to ever affect me.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago