this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
58 points (96.8% liked)

Canada

9925 readers
277 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

But PP said "build the houses" so they must have a serious plan. Right? Right?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

His plan was to raise taxes on people whose communities don’t increase their population by 5% each year and ban public transit from servicing commercial areas

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

⅔ of their plan sounds excellent, but any plan where "the" makes up a third of the words is missing some real substance.

[–] teppa@piefed.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Tying immigration to housing completions was his plan. Removing gst on housing was originally his idea. There was rezoning for density around transit and withholding federal funds from areas that don't build fast enough to encourage rezoning and reducing development taxes. Then there was selling off federal buildings and land to build housing. He also criticized the BoC for ignoring inflation and doing QE, because it rewarded asset holders, and he even said he would fire Tiff Macklem for ignoring his inflation mandate.

Now we have a housing minister who says housing is an investment, and Carney himself essentially repeated that in a round about way. Elbows up for homelessness.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XnkpiYLI7IY

https://www.conservative.ca/building-homes-not-bureaucracy/

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because they have their marching order wishlists from Pathways Alliance and other oil lobbies.

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

I think in this case it's more likely because most are profiting from being landlords (or their spouses are).

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Why so serious??