this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
197 points (96.2% liked)

Europe

6140 readers
728 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Left Party MP Cansin Köktürk was thrown out of a German parliament plenary chamber on Wednesday for wearing a t-shirt with the word "Palestine" printed on it, a move deemed a political statement by the parliamentary leadership.

collapsed inline media

Bundestag President Julia Klöckner intervened during the session, reminding MPs that political messages on clothing are not permitted in the chamber.

While the Bundestag does not have a detailed dress code, its rules require MPs and visitors to dress "in keeping with the prestige" of the institution. Enforcement of this standard is left to the discretion of the session chair.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 48 points 2 days ago (1 children)

God forbid politicians make political statements.

[–] Quittenbrot@feddit.org 59 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not with their clothes, though. The political debate in the Bundestag is conducted through words and to be fair, that seems like a reasonable idea.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (26 children)

AfD members of parliament are routinely wearing German flag pins, which carries a pretty obvious message coming from a far right party.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Trouble with that is that it is a German party doing German politics in Germany. There are German flags all over the Reichstag. Yes, everyone knows they do it because they are Nazis. But if push came to shove I think a court would rule in their favour that they are in line with the dresscode.

Now, if they were wearing a black t-shirt with just a German flag on it I think the consequences would be the same as in this case here. But they usually know how far they can push the rules.

They are experienced sea lions.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] astutemural@midwest.social 37 points 1 day ago

Can't have political statements in the place where we do politics.

[–] Melchior@feddit.org 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just to say it, but both the far right AFD and tankie BSW got into trouble for holding up signs in the Bundestag. Allowing t-shirts with prints would be such an obvious loophole around that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

While the Bundestag does not have a detailed dress code, its rules require MPs and visitors to dress “in keeping with the prestige” of the institution.

So, there is no actual rule that she actually broke, unless we interpret the word "Palestine" to be not in keeping with the prestige of the Budestag. Are other country names or geographical regions also not in keeping with the prestige of the Bundestag? Like, when I visit can I not wear a shirt that says "Greece" on it? Or that says "Quebec" or "Antarctica"? Or is this is a special rule for country names that butthurt Germany's "staatsraison"?

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago (6 children)

No political statements with clothing is established precedent and wearing a Palestine shirt today is a political statement. Greece? Currently, not really, no, don't see it. During the Greek debt crisis? Yes it would've been.

She's free to make a pro-Palestine speech, that's how political statements are supposed to be done in parliament. Occasionally there's stunts like these, and they always have the same outcome: A small amount of extra spotlight, then everyone forgets about it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Allemaniac@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

if you, a tourist, would wear written clothing, nothing happens. It is for members of parliament that they can be expelled. Although we often times see politians dressed in light blue and yellow, to show solidarity with Ukraine. So why not for Palestine? That would be aNtisEmiTiSm

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If she wore a Ukraine shirt (which would be based) or even an Israel shirt (which would not be based), it would have been handled differently. Hell apparently there is a history of members wearing soccer team shirts with no problems.

"The problem isn't the protests, it's what they're protesting." Macklemore

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why would you make that assumption? Its completely baseless and most likely untrue.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

My assumption is based on two years of German authorities and institutions cracking down on pro-Palestinian voices. Somehow, each time there is some specific rule or sub-rule that is being invoked, but somehow it always ends up being a silencing of pro-Palestinian protest, activism, speech.

Why I would assume the worst of German institutions when it comes to pro-Palestinian stances? Here is the fuck why:

I have simply lost faith in German institutions on this matter.

To return to you the question: why would I NOT assume that German institutions would find some way to ratfuck with pro-Palestinian voices? On what exactly can I build a set of good faith assumptions on German benevolence on the matter? Because I see fucking nothing.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

why would I NOT assume that German institutions would find some way to ratfuck with pro-Palestinian voices?

I disagree with that generality, but I grant you the point, it's a valid assumption to make.

However:

Nothing about what you said supports the assumption that people with Ukraine T-shirts wouldn't get booted. They would be.


Overall this is a not exactly uncommon thing in the Bundestag: Break the rules to get thrown out to put the spotlight on something. In fact, without the "getting thrown out" part it wouldn't make sense to wear clothing with political meaning in the first place, as everyone would be doing it, and everyone would ignore it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Theobroma@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago

"Doch es sind nicht immer Linke, Grüne und Sozialdemokraten, die die Kleiderordnung offen interpretieren. Die heutige Staatsministerin für Raumfahrt Dorothee Bär (CSU) trug 2015 unter ihrem Blazer ein Trikot des FC Bayern München, samt Logo der Telekom. Hier kam der Protest von links.

Die Beispiele zeigen: Die Würde des Hauses unterliegt auch dem Zeitgeist. Und der scheint – zumindest unter der Bundestagspräsidentin Klöckner – wieder konservativer zu werden. "

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

Should have had a second person wearing an Israel shirt, and see who gets kicked out.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

PoLiTiCaL sTaTeMeNt

I thought about spelling this onomatopoeically as it would sound with Bibi's dick in their mouth but I'm lazy

load more comments
view more: next ›