this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
588 points (98.5% liked)

World News

47062 readers
3146 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] termaxima@programming.dev 101 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (7 children)

“To protect children” is a stupid reason, but banning smoking anywhere outside of your own home, or spaces expressly dedicated to it, on the other hand, is how it should always have been.

[–] ADTJ@feddit.uk 30 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I'm from the UK where it's at least banned indoors.

Visiting European pubs/bars where people still smoke is nuts and my clothes always stink after

[–] Renohren@lemmy.today 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The same ban exists in France and most other EU countries. And the fines/administrative closures are quite stringent.

[–] brewery@feddit.uk 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, went to Spain, and woke up with a sore throat and really smelly clothes. Took me back to before the ban and realised how good that was for everyone

[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I don't know where you went, but since 2011 it's been illegal to smoke indoors in Spain. It's still legal to smoke on outdoor seating in bars/restaurants, but fortunately that's going to be made illegal as well.

[–] brewery@feddit.uk 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It was illegal but not enforced at all or followed by the locals, so not followed by anybody else either. During the day was fine but in the evening and night it was like there was no law

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 24 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

There is an absolute metric shitload of proven scientific evidence that smoke inhalation causes lasting damage to developing lungs and hearts. Do you deny this scientific evidence?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Owlboi@lemm.ee 9 points 6 days ago

I'd argue the less prevalent smoking is in public the less likely children will turn to smoking in the future. makes sense to me

[–] boughtmysoul@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Replace “children” with “non-consenting people” and you’re getting close. Children are the most non-consenting people in society and deserve special protection accordingly.

[–] shplane@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

“To protect children” is a stupid reason

Just depends on what sells the legislation. People can be very entitled but they might bend if it’s to “protect the children”

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SW42@lemmy.world 48 points 6 days ago (45 children)
load more comments (45 replies)
[–] Susurrus@lemm.ee 44 points 6 days ago (2 children)

You could say smoking is one of the most human activities ever. Does nothing but actively harm and potentially kill everything around you. Just what we're the best at.

But seriously now. Can we speed up smoking bans? Like, everywhere?

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (7 children)

But seriously now. Can we speed up smoking bans? Like, everywhere?

Some European countries, including mine, has decided to raise the smoking age by 1 every year, essentially banning the next generation from smoking. Not really rapid or speeding up, but future is looking good

There was a slight problem where some people were allowed to smoke for portion of the year after birthday and before the age increase, for every year

load more comments (7 replies)

Yeah prohibition is famous for working very well and not have any side effect.

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 6 days ago
[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I live in a country with a strict outdoor smoking ban and I love it.

There are dedicated smoking areas for people to smoke outdoors, but they are really small and cramped with smokers.

It’s actually really nice, you never see or smell people smoking unless you wonder too close to the designated smoking areas which are often really out of the way.

The streets are not really clean here, but at least it’s not cigarette butts. Even things like vapes need to be smoked in a designated area, but sometimes people do it on the street anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago

Good i hope more countries adopt this. Türkiye is terrible for this, lovely country and people but there are smokers almost everywhere.

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago

Europeans should get a new hobby, smoking is gross and you smell like burnt shit

[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

Banning children seems like it would be more effective.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 13 points 6 days ago

Dang, France is really about to take away the one thing that the USA has always been ahead of them on.

[–] PattyP@lemm.ee 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (8 children)

This comment section is a disaster, just as bad as reddit. Comments of no substance on the side of popular opinion get upvotes, and waves of downvotes come for anyone who disagrees even a little, and even if they do it in a reasonable way.

I’m mildly asthmatic so I don’t smoke, vape, etc. I have tried a few times and it is simply too much for my lungs to cope with. I still think banning people from smoking in public parks or on beaches is a bit much, and not doing the same with vaping seems like a strange double standard. I had a college roommate who both vaped and smoked, and the vaping bothered me more. I still put up with it.

Hopefully enforcement is reasonable - respectful smokers who deliberately try to keep their distance should be allowed to enjoy themselves, but I understand prosecuting(?) those who show no care and smoke right next to nonsmokers.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 days ago

Comments of no substance on the side of popular opinion get upvotes, and waves of downvotes come for anyone who disagrees even a little, and even if they do it in a reasonable way.

Lemmy seems much worse for this than reddit TBH.

There's a number of topics about which any dissent is met with vehement derision. As in those engaging in wrong think are assholes.

I don't really know of course but I suspect it's because lemmy has a narrower demographic than reddit. Opinions are just generally more homogeneous. I guess I'm describing an echo chamber.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

I thought everyone in France smoked, including the kids, no?

I gave mine nicotine patch from age 5.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 days ago

LOL like here in Montreal I see people smoking right next to the "No smoking within 3 meters" or whatever sign.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

I like these laws but also I want to smoke in some places. I'd love a return of places like cigar lounges and whisky bars

[–] ihatefascist@lemm.ee 8 points 5 days ago (3 children)

To protect children, meanwhile the soil is filled with cancer-inducing products pumped away illegally by big chemistry plants. In belgium and netherlands we can barely eat our own produce thanks to this. When are we gonna ban them??

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 5 days ago (3 children)

GOOD point. They shouldn't ban cigarettes until everything else bad is also banned.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Ban children!?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oyo@lemm.ee 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Protests bigger than anti-Trump ones in the US incoming in 3..2..1..

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

French smokers about to burn down their government buildings in protest

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I love how everyone supporting this just assumes you'll still be able to smoke at your own home when it doesn't saying anything of the sort. It explicitly states 'where children COULD be present'. This is literally everywhere short of some BDSM dungeon. This is basically going to make the population choose between smoking and having kids.

[–] Kiliyukuxima@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Which actually sounds fair. Kids do not choose to be born and do not need to inhale smoke because parents are addicted to smoking

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 days ago

This is basically going to make the population choose between smoking and having kids.

Hell I'd start smoking again.

[–] Child_of_the_bukkake@lemmy.cafe 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

Yeah don't smoke near your kids. It's not that hard.

They're also making the population choose between drinking and driving.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›