this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
199 points (98.5% liked)

politics

24145 readers
2750 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Things he can't actually do for $800?"

OTOH, lets say he could.

Taking a bunch of money from one elite college and distributing it to dozens (hundreds?) of working class schools all over the country?

I thought he hated socialism...

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] obvs@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Oh yeah.

I'm SURRRRE that he'll give grants to trade schools.

That's SOOOOOO belieeeeevable.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

lol my immediate thought was “that’d be fucking sweet if I actually believed him.”

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

It will go to the Trump School of Business Online University.

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago

It's just crypto all the way down!

[–] mister_flibble@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

The Donald Trump Center for Kids who Can't Business Good and Wanna Learn to do Other Stuff Good Too.

[–] Kickforce@lemmy.wtf 3 points 2 weeks ago

Lessons organized in cooperation with the internationally reknowned PragerU.

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

About as legit as any other business school.

[–] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

Well there are about 8.5K trade schools, so they would only get $353K each; which is less than they are losing thanks to Trump’s “big beautiful bill” gutting the trade school funds to help teach things like how to install solar panels and repair things like heat pumps

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 19 points 2 weeks ago

This is HORRIBLE! I DONT want MY Tax Dollars going to OTHER People's EDUCATION!

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's $3B that's gonna disappear into someone's pocket.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The money will be going to Republican owned private for-profit trade schools that will be nothing more than diploma mills cranking out unqualified "graduates".

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

BAH GAWD KING, THAT'S THE CORPSE OF ITT TECH RISING FROM THE DEAD!

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

More like Devry, lest we forget his first SecEd. Though I suppose the wrestling reference works for the current one.

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm cool with this. Let's devalue the trades by having an over-abundance of blue collar workers while simultaneously increasing demand for white collar jobs by reducing the supply of educated workers.

I get my toilet unclogged for even cheaper, and I get more money ten years from now when demand has risen.

I'd prefer to just have educated workers instead of glorifying back-breaking manual labor that the employees hate, but ill take a win where I can lol

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That or businesses will need more immigrants to fill those white collar jobs Americans will no longer be educated for. But because of immigration policy, they won’t be able to fill those roles. So they will leave and open up shop in India or Central America.

[–] nagaram@startrek.website 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As an office IT guy, a vast majority of office jobs could be done by nearly anyone. If they just stopped requiring a college degree to do those jobs and trained people, I think the vast majority of office work will be done

That being said, HR would rather import people with H1Bs, drastically under pay them, and create another layer of class division but separating themselves from the brown people offices to work at the new executive offices or do full WFH forever then admit a college degree was always a class tax to move from working to might class.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

a vast majority of office jobs could be done by nearly anyone. If they just stopped requiring a college degree to do those jobs and trained people

Oh, I thought it's just Russia's problem that everyone requires a bullshit degree to, I dunno, clean PCs and reinstall Windows

[–] nagaram@startrek.website 1 points 2 weeks ago

That's so much of IT. They're paying for me to get a degree but I already have the job. So it's obvious it's just a status symbol.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Early on Trump came out in support of H1B Visas. They're practically slave labor and will drive down the rewards of white collar jobs. They want to gatekeep upward economic mobility. They are going to cap federal student loan awards if the new budget bill passes (albeit a very high limit) and probably drive it down further so only the rich will have degrees. The rest of us get to fight over which trade accepts us.

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

BRB, gonna create a "trade school" and buy trump meme coin. We'll gonna need more funding though. After trump's cut, 2 billion ain't enough.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 weeks ago

No. Don't. Stop.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He doesn't care who it helps. As long as it hurts his political enemy in the moment. He'll forget he was mad by lunch. Dude is sundowning hard.

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

What is sundowning? Is it referencing his age?

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 6 points 2 weeks ago

Sundowning is when you're alert and oriented when you're well rested, but as you become fatigued from routine daily activity, the dementia starts to take over.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Absaroka@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Certainly explains his 1am, all caps diatribes.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

My great grandfather had a stroke and could no longer feed himself so he was placed in a nursing home.

He was perfectly lucid during the day, knew who everyone was, could remember my grandmothers phone number, all good.

When the sun went down he thought he was living in a hotel in Boise, Idaho in 1939.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm probably ok with that, surprisingly.

[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The fact that you are entertaining the idea proves that you missed the entire plot. That money would be funnel straight into their pockets.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 2 weeks ago

Because no one at Harvard is stealing value

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago

There's the real agenda. Trade schools don't teach critical thinking.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

There's a difference between having a liberal bias and simply not having the GOP's agenda

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago

It baffles me that Trump thinks it's a good idea to mess with the school that most lawyers come from.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, his promises kinda are socialism, just wrapped into rebel flag racist and qanon crap. Including "returning industries back from China" parts, those are not ideal clean socialism so to say, but they match USSR. And the anti-diversity parts - as Soviet-socialist in emotion as it gets. Just aimed at minorities "unjustly getting special treatment".

Let him. Also why would Harvard need federal grants.

[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

Why was the aristocrat university getting welfare checks in the first place?