this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
387 points (94.9% liked)

Games

38743 readers
1939 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To quote LazyTown: Yar har, fiddle de dee...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I didn't want borderlands even when it was cheaper.

[–] Hellmo_Luciferrari@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Guess we all know what we have to do

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Since I didn’t enjoy the handsome collection I wouldn’t buy it at any price, but even for games I do enjoy I wait until they are on sale preferably with the DLCs included

[–] KingOogaBooga@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Yarrr Matey, they'll find a way.

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Suck my cock pitchford. Hope the game bombs as bad as the movie fuckwad.

[–] schwim@lemm.ee 3 points 20 hours ago

Or wait the number of years it takes to be on sale for $20.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Im always thrown off as a Canadian when I see these headlines because we’ve been paying $80 for games for decades.

Video games haven’t risen in cost with inflation and they’re much better and bigger now so I’m not super upset, but they are now at the point where I won’t buy a game at release or full price. I think the new price here is $93 cause that’s what the new Indiana jones is going for

What I hate most is that the game actually costs $150 and they split it and give you a stripped version for $80. I think gta 4 was the last game i truly felt made sense, game releases, we buy it, story dlc comes out later we get it, transaction over. No online bullshit that tries to keep you paying money into the game without end. Not a game split into little chunks and sold as tiers at release

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Zess@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Likely pedophile Randy Pitchford.

[–] 8bittech@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

They never fixed the bugs in Borderlands 3. Let me rush out and get this

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I'm really bad about buying new games at launch where I like the franchise and getting burned (looking at you bf2042).

However with all of the stupid politics, tariffs, and recession coming in the US, I'm sure the hell not buying this at $80, even if I'm a long term borderlands fan. I have way too many games in my library I should be playing/finishing anyway.

I hope others speak with their wallets as well.

[–] Siresly@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've found a way.

  1. Invite Randy Pitchford to Medieval Times.
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vipsu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

My game backlog has reached mars so I am in no hurry. Still havent even started tiny tina's wonderlands.

[–] jaykrown@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Nope, just would play Tiny Tina's Wonderland again honestly, which I got for around $10 when it was heavily on sale a year ago.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Idk. I think gamers are overly upset about $80 games. While I am sympathetic to not wanting the price to go up, the fact of the matter is that brand new video games cost pretty much the same as they did 30 years ago, while the cost of everything else has basically doubled in that time. I know it's probably not what is going to happen but if $80 video games are what it takes to get us away from shitty microtransactions in full price games, then I'm all for it. I know the crowd on Lemmy will just say they should make less profit and do neither but that's just not how the world works right now and nobody is going to do that.

Food for thought- here are some prices in 1996 and today

New video game: 1996- $67 (Super Mario 64), 2025- $70

McDonald's Big Mac meal: 1996- $2.45, 2025-$9.29

Base package Honda Civic: 1996- $10,360, 2025-$24,250

Average apartment - 1996- $550/mo, 2025- $1,540/mo

Median annual income- 1996- $20,109, 2025- $50,200

Doesn't one of these stand out?

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

And let's take this outside of the myopic view of only looking at inflation.

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/video-game-industry-revenues-by-platform/

Console gaming revenue: 1996 - 7 billion, 2022 - 30 billion

Let's look at specifically Nintendo here since we're talking about Super Mario 64

https://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/pdf/2001/011121e.pdf

2001, 664 million in profit, adjusted for inflation in 2022 dollars, 1 billion.

https://www.tweaktown.com/news/84668/nintendo-made-6-billion-net-sales-1-7-profits-in-q322/index.html

2022, 1.7 billion dollars in profit.

You forget that in 1996 the gaming pool was also magnitudes smaller compared to today and despite all of the whining about increased development costs, which I also think is bullshit but that's a different conversation, profits have increased to keep up.

So my opinion, no there's absolutely no justification for a 80 dollar price point when you look at the over all picture.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›