this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
555 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

66353 readers
4590 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The onrushing AI era was supposed to create boom times for great gadgets. Not long ago, analysts were predicting that Apple Intelligence would start a “supercycle” of smartphone upgrades, with tons of new AI features compelling people to buy them. Amazon and Google and others were explaining how their ecosystems of devices would make computing seamless, natural, and personal. Startups were flooding the market with ChatGPT-powered gadgets, so you’d never be out of touch. AI was going to make every gadget great, and every gadget was going to change to embrace the AI world.

This whole promise hinged on the idea that Siri, Alexa, Gemini, ChatGPT, and other chatbots had gotten so good, they’d change how we do everything. Typing and tapping would soon be passé, all replaced by multimodal, omnipresent AI helpers. You wouldn’t need to do things yourself; you’d just tell your assistant what you need, and it would tap into the whole world of apps and information to do it for you. Tech companies large and small have been betting on virtual assistants for more than a decade, to little avail. But this new generation of AI was going to change things.

There was just one problem with the whole theory: the tech still doesn’t work. Chatbots may be fun to talk to and an occasionally useful replacement for Google, but truly game-changing virtual assistants are nowhere close to ready. And without them, the gadget revolution we were promised has utterly failed to materialize.

In the meantime, the tech industry allowed itself to be so distracted by these shiny language models that it basically stopped trying to make otherwise good gadgets. Some companies have more or less stopped making new things altogether, waiting for AI to be good enough before it ships. Others have resorted to shipping more iterative, less interesting upgrades because they have run out of ideas other than “put AI in it.” That has made the post-ChatGPT product cycle bland and boring, in a moment that could otherwise have been incredibly exciting. AI isn’t good enough, and it’s dragging everything else down with it.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/spnT6

(page 2) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jimius@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just look at how ppl use their smart speakers. They ask it to set timers or ask for the weather. AI will be the norm once the benefit is obvious to everyone. When I can trust my AI with my credit card info and allow it to purchase stuff for me. Right now AI is basically a self-organizing dictionary which is often confidently incorrect. Not once has GPT told me it didn't know something.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I asked chatGPT about a quote from Iain Banks - The Player of Games. It claims not to know about it's contents except for the cover blurb. Bullshit.

I fed it a detail and it suddenly remembered.

They must have programmed chatgpt to deny that it has read copyright works.

Deepseek had no such qualms. It couldn't give an exact quote but it did give what it called an approximation.

[–] Jimius@lemmy.ml 2 points 23 hours ago

As a total aside: The baader-meinhof phenomenon at play. Just yesterday I was talking about Lain Banks because his work was quoted in a video game. And here he shows up again.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Some More News had the right take on this: all these companies just dumped (either in investment or development) (hundreds of) billions of dollars into AI development.

The problem is, we're still 10-15 years away from AI being actually useful in gadgets and stuff. But these companies want to get paid now, so they're shoving the cheapest, shittiest "functional" AI onto the market just to try and recoup some losses. And it's painfully apparent it isn't working.

Typing and tapping would soon be passé,

The tech certainly isn't ready for this. My voice input to chatgpt gets automatically translated into Welsh.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

That's not the AI problem. The AI problem is that it tracks the user to benefit the company's owner. Fuck that. Pure and simple. Take the AI out and put Linux on it. I'm tired of Amazon loading up Toilet paper on my cart before I ever know I'm running out of it. Sounds helpful, but stretches to some really evil shit like getting deported because your friends got deported and AI figured out you were here on the wrong visa. That shit is evil.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›