this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
290 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

70259 readers
3650 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lyrl@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bizarre to have a headline claiming five "types" were identified, but then only describe the behavior of a single type. What are the other four?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Omg no it isn't!

This is literally the point, there is a clear difference between a hegelian dialectic and brute-force manichaeanism.

Social media has allowed us to perceive the one as the other.

Now everybody thinks they're the only righteous ones and anyone who deviates from their strict ~~opinion~~ dogma is evil.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I’ve been online since 1995. And back in those days, about the worst argument people had was Star Wars vs Star Trek. That’s because the general online population at that time valued fact-based discussion and proper sources. Not like today, where someone’s feelings seem to trump actual fact.

If I post 1+1=2 with proper sources, some idiot is bound to come along to argue that 1+1=tomato soup, that the moon is made of aged brie and that 5G on phones is turning frogs gay. It’s exhausting.

There’s simply too many blithering idiots online who reject facts. And unfortunately instead of blocking them, people engage. Thus giving them incentive to keep doing it.

[–] Darkenfolk@dormi.zone 2 points 6 days ago

Disclaimer, nostalgia glasses may color experiences in a slightly more positive light than it really was.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I just call it out immediately and shut people down. I spend countless hours researching and reading and I don't have time for devil's advocates anymore. Here on Lemmy I will just block them and in real life I just tell them homie I don't play that.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] prex@aussie.zone 4 points 6 days ago

No they're not.

~/s~

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Playing Devil's Advocate. has been around way before the internet.

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 3 points 1 week ago

insert 2 spidermen pointing at each other

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Some people while cleaning a table just love to scratch it a bit. Why not leave that fossilized fat stain alone.

Same vibes. There's no use in agreeing. You are just adding to a clueless crowd.

Disagreeing helps everyone.

[–] shitmenot@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 week ago

Sounds like that antiyank guy. Always looking for the latest drama.

Probably a lot of russian trolls as well

[–] AidsKitty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yes some people love to argue. I get it, I think arguing with others is fun. It's not so great online tho. It's empty and soul-less.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

~~Reddit~~ Lemmy

FIFY

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

Devils advocate is very much in my nature but not so much when things are being done so obviously badly. Its great when discussions are more philisophical in nature.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›