I'm fully in favour of cutting off the oil but I think it might be wise to be careful on that one, and first secure some other places to sell it. We do still need to eat. If we're not careful this will turn into a siege.
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
33 points (100.0% liked)
Canada
8706 readers
1976 users here now
What's going on Canada?
Related Communities
๐ Meta
๐บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories
- Alberta
- British Columbia
- Manitoba
- New Brunswick
- Newfoundland and Labrador
- Northwest Territories
- Nova Scotia
- Nunavut
- Ontario
- Prince Edward Island
- Quebec
- Saskatchewan
- Yukon
๐๏ธ Cities / Local Communities
- Calgary (AB)
- Edmonton (AB)
- Greater Sudbury (ON)
- Guelph (ON)
- Halifax (NS)
- Hamilton (ON)
- Kootenays (BC)
- London (ON)
- Mississauga (ON)
- Montreal (QC)
- Nanaimo (BC)
- Oceanside (BC)
- Ottawa (ON)
- Port Alberni (BC)
- Regina (SK)
- Saskatoon (SK)
- Thunder Bay (ON)
- Toronto (ON)
- Vancouver (BC)
- Vancouver Island (BC)
- Victoria (BC)
- Waterloo (ON)
- Windsor (ON)
- Winnipeg (MB)
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
๐ Sports
Hockey
- Main: c/Hockey
- Calgary Flames
- Edmonton Oilers
- Montrรฉal Canadiens
- Ottawa Senators
- Toronto Maple Leafs
- Vancouver Canucks
- Winnipeg Jets
Football (NFL): incomplete
Football (CFL): incomplete
Baseball
Basketball
Soccer
- Main: /c/CanadaSoccer
- Toronto FC
๐ป Schools / Universities
- BC | UBC (U of British Columbia)
- BC | SFU (Simon Fraser U)
- BC | VIU (Vancouver Island U)
- BC | TWU (Trinity Western U)
- ON | UofT (U of Toronto)
- ON | UWO (U of Western Ontario)
- ON | UWaterloo (U of Waterloo)
- ON | UofG (U of Guelph)
- ON | OTU (Ontario Tech U)
- QC | McGill (McGill U)
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
๐ต Finance, Shopping, Sales
- Personal Finance Canada
- BAPCSalesCanada
- Canadian Investor
- Buy Canadian
- Quebec Finance
- Churning Canada
๐ฃ๏ธ Politics
- General:
- Federal Parties (alphabetical):
- By Province (alphabetical):
๐ Social / Culture
Rules
- Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
I believe that's the plan. They say economic turmoil but they mean siege.
the trouble is that if it's a siege, it goes both ways, and I don't think in our current state we're in a position to win it. That may change as we settle in, Canadians are a stubborn and hardy people.
After every war we are in new things get added to the Geneva convention, because of stuff we do, so I say come at us US see what happens.
ehhh, I'm all in favour of defending Canada and would die doing so, but let's maybe stop with the "come at us" stuff.
The U.S Military would absolutely, without a doubt, completely destroy us in our current state. There is no defending. There's only retreat, right now. They may not be able to hold all of Canada, but they don't want to, probably. They'll settle with Alberta and Ontario.
Let's face it. Canada fucked up by neglecting its military. We could argue the reasons why, but the reality is we're learning a very valuable lesson right now - and it may be too late, too. It'll take decades to build our defense. Let's start now.
We are not the 1.1 million strong of WW2 anymore. We should stop riding the coattails of history and move on.
We had a French sub appear in Atlantic Canada showing at least France is ready for Article 4.
I mean, I don't think the French were here to do a show of force against the U.S. I think they were here to show us the sub because Canada is ready to buy some. Call it advertising. The French aren't here to protect Canada. We're alone in this. The sooner we realize this, the better.
Our best course of action is to put up front the failures of our past decisions and then move on to rectify those gaps. It'll take time and a lot of effort and willingness of Canadians to join in on the new adventure of defending our nation, but it can be done. In that instance, and only that instance, can we then look to our history of our once great military and work to beat it.
NATO article 5 if the US attacks or tries to invade Canada. I know for a fact the Netherlands would help Canada, France and the UK eventually too. Then it would be WW3.
Those dumb fucks couldnโt even hold arid lands populated by brown people who didnโt speak English and dressed different. Highly doubtful they could hold anything here without destroying everything and killing civilians indiscriminately.
and first secure some other places to sell it
Isn't most of Alberta's oil exported as unrefined bitumen and then refined in the US? If that's the case, we'd need to find a trading partner that can handle our product.
afaik yes, and that's exactly the problem I'm referring to.
*gestures to the past 20+ years of me and many like me saying we need to refine this shit locally*
sigh.
You need to refine it yourself. Exporting raw materials are good for short term profits but you are more exposed to price fluctuations . Look at kora for instance. They seems to have a more stable economy now than when they mostly expected raw materials
Apparently theyโve been looking for new buyers
Also, whenever someone touches oik that the us feels they are obliged to, invasion follows...
Mind you, they will bever be able to hold Canada, they haven't been able to hold anything since world war 2 and holding a territory that literally has family and friends, that will never end well for the US.
But they'd be stupid enough to go for it anyway and it would destroy the US and Canada and for what?
So that Cheeto and the idiots can get more moneys