this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
902 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

69985 readers
3301 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I’d rather people not profiting off copyrighted work be permitted than those who profit off it

[–] gabbath@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I read this as pro-piracy and anti-AI, generally speaking, since the former is for personal use (art should be free to share and enjoy) while the latter is for commercial use (you should not be allowed to freely profit off the work of artists).

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

I intended it that way

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Please, save the copyright industry! If using these for AI isnt made ridiculously expensive, we will never be able to build a proper monopoly on top of this tech!

They get popular artists to sign these things but its the record companies (all three of them) that are really behind this.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)
  1. There’s a practical concern: how do you prevent ai without preventing people.
  2. What if you want to allow search, and how is that different than ai, legally or in practice?
  3. Does this put Reddit in a new light? Free content to users but charging for the api to do bulk download such as for ai?
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gluca23@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Greed have no age.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They are just illegally selling us off as slaves. That is what is happening. All our fault for not having strong citizen watchdogs, clamping down on this behavior.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Says the dude who completed a song using AI.

[–] Ordinary_Person@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago (4 children)

He used AI to Isolate John's voice from an old Demo. As long as a percentage of the proceeds of the song goes to John's estate, I don't think it's quite the same as AI ripping off artists.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›