this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
652 points (99.1% liked)

News

29297 readers
2927 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Catholic Church has issued a warning to its clergy in Washington state: Any priest who complies with a new law requiring the reporting of child abuse confessions to authorities will be excommunicated.

https://www.newsweek.com/catholic-church-excommunicate-priests-following-new-us-state-law-2069039

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orclev@lemmy.world 284 points 1 day ago (39 children)

I read the headline and was prepared to support the church on this one (for once). Then I read the first paragraph of the article. I have never made a 180 on an opinion so fast. The fuck is wrong with the Catholic church and child abuse? Why is this a constant problem with them?

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 47 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The entire religion is based on shame and fear. The clergy take advantage of both.

[–] cocolowlander@feddit.nl 24 points 1 day ago

This isn't just Catholic church thing. It's rampant in any religion, organization, hierarchy, etc. where the person on top of the totem pole demand obedience, they are insulated from outside accountability, and there is a culture of secrecy.

Go probe Ultra-orthodox Jews, Amish community, Quranic Schools. It's rife with sexual abuse.

[–] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a constant problem because its a cult that wants to protect its cult members. It finds no issue with indoctrinating kids, to the point where nobody batted an eye when they recently (like, in the past 10 years) decreased the age at which children go through the sacrament of Confirmation. The same sacrament that is meant to affirm your adulthood in the church, where you say, "I may have been told to practice this by my parents before, but now I'm an adult now and choose to practice it of my own volition."

They do this when children are thirteen years old. Thirteen.

When I was fifteen I did not have the capacity to make this decision for myself. Now I have to live with the fact I'm on a list somewhere as an adult in the church. The Catholic Church is an evil institution that uses trauma for the purpose of coercion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 19 points 1 day ago

Oh yeah, my bad for not including what it's about. I'll edit that back into the post.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Personally, I think it goes back to the Catholic Church's special status as its own sovereign country. They didnt just elect a Pope this week. They elected an absolute monarch. Even though that monarch's territory is only .5 sqkm, it used to be much larger, and the Church literally has outposts everywhere indirectly subject to its rule.

And a key thing to understand is that the Church doesn't use confession to hide crimes from just anyone. If some random Catholic confessed to a priest that he was diddling kids, you can bet that as part of the penance, the priest would tell that person to turn themselves in to the authorities. But we know what has happened when the confessor was a priest.

The Church was always super arrogant when it came to transgressions by its own people. To them, subjecting a priest to civil law makes just as much sense as subjecting an Italian to Australian law. When a priest confessed he was diddling kids, they would handle it in their own manner, without getting the local authorities involved.

That's the real reason why this law is written the way it is. It's to keep the Church from hiding its own people. The Church, as an institution, has proven over the years that it can't be trusted on that front.

I haven't read the law, but it would be interesting if it explicitly allowed a "mandatory reporter" to satisfy the requirement by facilitating the transgressor to turn themselves in. That is a clear way out of this problem, keeping the confidentiality intact while keeping the local government's jurisdiction over crimes as well.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
[–] merdaverse@lemmy.world 138 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Therapists are required to break confidentiality if they suspect child abuse. The church thinks it is above secular law and only answers to God, not to mention the protection it offers to its own child abusers. It's complete nonsense and a good example of why religious tolerance has limits.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That's not quite accurate. Therapists are required to break confidentiality if they believe there is an ongoing risk to others, not because someone tells them of child abuse they committed in the past. In that sense, a confessional would probably be the same - you don't confess to things that haven't happened yet. You're more likely to express ongoing risk in therapy than in confession.

If the confessor indicated that they were going to continue doing things, that's when a confession should become reportable, if we're want the law to be secular and equitable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

This is completely accurate, and yet so many responses are pretending it's not.

A mandated reporter is a person who is required by law to report crimes, typically if they know or suspect a child or vulnerable adult has been or is at risk of being abused or neglected

Mandated reporters have to report child abuse. Full goddamn stop. No, it doesn't matter if it's in the past, why the fuck would that change anything?

These people really think that it's okay not to report pedophilia? Why? Because the pedophile confessed to inarguably one of the worst crimes imaginable, and promised not to do it anymore?

You think a therapist wouldn't report that because their patient said they won't do it anymore? Did they pinky swear?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 124 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Why aren't all the preists who diddle kids excommunicated?

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Catholic Church = Child Molester Haven.

Pretty simple.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago

Oh, it's most churches. And the GOP.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 23 hours ago

Because that's the whole point of the church. It's just one big sham so they can diddle kids

[–] _____@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

The oughta write a song about it

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

And for extra reading, learn about how the new pope covered up for priests that abused kids when he was a bishop:

https://www.jpost.com/international/article-853274

*Edit: removed the bad source. The Jpost article is good and includes several additional sources. For more: https://www.qwant.com/?q=+Robert+Prevost+abuse+cover+up

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If you're gonna bash the guy, at least use a credible source for christ's sake.

Edit: 👍

the Will County Gazette is an imposter site, lacks transparency, and publishes false information. As a result, we rate them right-center, biased, and Questionable.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/will-county-gazette-bias/

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 19 points 1 day ago

Right you are, updated accordingly. Thanks for the tip.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The U.S. Department of Justice said it is investigating whether the law infringes on First Amendment religious protections.

collapsed inline media

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

Looks like I'm going to continue not being catholic.

[–] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Wait a sec. What the fuck? So reporting child rape is now BAD???

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 51 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Note for the internet: I am just clarifying the Catholic stance. I am not Catholic and not defending them.

Priests cannot reveal what someone tells them in confession. It's a lot like attorney-client privilege, as your priest is supposed to be your advocate before God. Breaking the seal of confession is a big deal (to them) because, just like criminals deserve representation, sinners need to be able to confess.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They hold confession to be inviolate, which is fucking bullshit. Doctors, including psychiatrists, who aren't allowed to share that shit do have to report certain criminal acts to police.

Unfortunately all too often freedom of religion translates to freedom from consequences. Fuck the Catholic church (and all churches) in general, but in particular for shit like this. Three Catholic church isn't unique in this, it's just got the most rigidly hierarchical, top-down structure of them all.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 day ago (7 children)

And there goes any hope of Ameripope not being a piece of shit. Delightful.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This article is from 2 days ago before he was elected the pope.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Coyote_sly@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Being a piece of shit is a prerequisite to be a religious leader, full stop.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There's all this talk about how this will automatically excommunicate priests who violate the confessional and how it's a grave sin and how the law is forcing them to sin and all that. I would understand the extreme pushback on this if this made a priest go to hell.

Here's the thing: Excommunication is TEMPORARY!! The penalty for a priest violating the confessional and potentially saving the lives of many children is a temporary separation from the Church that can readmit the priest after a penance. They care more about themselves being away from the Church for a short period of time than for the lifetime of health and happiness of children. They make it sound like it's the worst punishment you can give to a priest, on par with the punishment this gives to a kid who is harmed. It's fucking sickening.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (4 children)

readmit the priest after a penance

The priest actually has to repent - if he still thinks he did the right thing, he isn't forgiven.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 25 points 5 hours ago (7 children)

The worlds largest pedophile ring doing gods work I guess.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 23 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

A curious question. Why isn't everyone a mandatory reporter for child abuse? And assuming there is a good reason why, then why are doctors and such specifically seperated out. And do priests fit that same criteria?

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 18 points 10 hours ago

You've touched on a key point, I think. Doctors and other professionals have mandatory reporting because a) they are in positions of respect and trust within the community, and b) they are professionals, as defined in law, and have standards to uphold.

Priests definitely meet the definition of a), however b) is a bit of a sticking point: their role isn't defined by law, but by the church. Furthermore, a court can order you to go to therapy sessions, but they can't order you to go to confession - it's completely voluntary. A therapist could tease out previous abuse, but a priest will only hear what the confessor wants to tell them about.

I'm in line with you in thinking that everyone should report abuse, but I think that a priest has more in common with an average person in this regard compared to a person working in a legally protected profession. There would be legal consequences for impersonating a therapist, but not for impersonating a priest.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kworpy@lemm.ee 20 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheRealKuni@midwest.social 20 points 9 hours ago (33 children)

Separation of church and state goes both ways.

Confession is a religious rite. Try to legislate that rite is a violation of that separation.

Priests are bound by their office to maintain absolute confidentiality of confessed sins. Otherwise people are not likely to confess their sins.

It doesn’t matter how you, personally, feel about this or their religion or the value of confession as a sacrament, that’s their religion. The state doesn’t get to intervene.

The church should stay out of state affairs, and the state should stay out of church affairs. Exceptions exist, like when practices are outright criminal in themselves. But the state cannot compel a priest to violate their office. This is long accepted. You cannot compel a priest to testify about confession, for example.

Priests can encourage people to go to the police, but that’s it. Their role in confession is between the sinner and their god.

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

They've always had this policy. A priest would be excommunicated for revealing even a murderer, if they knew about it from a confession.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 17 points 5 hours ago

I was really hoping they'd be refusing to comply with unjust laws. If they wanted ways to look like the good guys, these days we've got plenty.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Imagine thinking you could sin recklessly, tell it to some dude in a funny hat/robe and that God is somehow okay with it. Imagine keeping the identities of child abusers secret because of that stupid line of thought (or because you can relate to the person touching kids).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Helvetica@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

Oh, I thought maybe this had to do with standing up against some regressive anti-immigration law, but nope, it's just the Catholic church being weird about sexual abuse. Again.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 6 hours ago

Geez... I never thought I would see so much support for religious bullshit on this site. I'd rather see fewer children harmed than preserve the "sanctity" of confession, and every excommunicated priest is a priest with actual integrity.

[–] dzso@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I support this state law, though I think it's unlikely to directly have the intended effect and will probably just prevent people from confessing instead.

I don't think people with a guilty conscience should have a way to clear their conscience other than behaving better and making up for their wrongs with better behavior.

At the same time, I get why the Catholic Church opposes the state law. And it's one of the biggest reasons I'm against all Christian religions, Evangelicalism included: they're more concerned about power than about people. And yeah, I think the Catholic Church's stance on this issue is fucked up, just like most Christian stances on political moral issues are fucked up these days.

But the timing of this article, and the right wing motivations against Catholicism make it clear that this article is also more concerned about power than about people. The state law doesn't stop child abuse or result in any more reporting of child abuse.

The way I see it, this article is actually right wing propaganda targeting the Pope because he supports Europe and Ukraine against Russia.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›