this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

70942 readers
3568 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/30934764

The “privacy-first” company surprised its user base when CEO Andy Yen lauded Trump on social media.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Godort@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

"We're not liberal or conservative, we're a secret third thing!(conservative)"

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

They vote for whoever helps them get paid the most.

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They're swiss.

We have more parties in our equivalent of the presidential office than you have parties in total.

I have huge problems with this notion that you have to be either democrat or conservative. They don't even cover 50% of the opinions I, a green-liberal (actual liberal, not US-definition), hold.

You're absolutely able and allowed to have your own opinion different from what any party official says.

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

When commenting on US politics, they should be aware of US political realities though. When taking position relative to US politics, they should be aware of that. At the very least, they should comment that they're progressive or something along the lines of "Our political orientation isn't represented in US politics" to acknowledge that, like you did.

But when your CEO endorses Republicans, pretending you're neutral isn't a good look.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 4 months ago

Don't forget, Swiss Neutrality is the special kind of neutrality that lets them store gold bullion made from Jewish tooth fillings.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

“Until corporate Dems are thrown out, the reality is that Republicans remain more likely to tackle Big Tech abuses.”

I don't believe that they haven't heard of Lina Khan.

[–] lksaar@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 months ago

Yes, big fan of Lina Khan, I worked with her in 2020 on the House report on antitrust (the House was controlled by Democrats back then). I've discussed this elsewhere, but certain events in 2022 made it very clear that further progress on antitrust was unlikely under Democratic leadership. You can read more about the backstory here: https://time.com/6243256/schumer-kills-antitrust-big-tech-bills/

his reddit account is pretry active if you want to read bad takes

[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Problem is, she was lobbying Sony so hard that her corruption was clearly seen by everyone, she fought tooth and nail so Microsoft wouldn't buy call of duty, and was saying that microsoft gaming department will become a monopoly, and... You see a monopoly out there? Microsoft gaming department is a giant flop even with call of duty, of what monopoly she was telling then?

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 4 months ago

Microsoft gaming department is a giant flop even with call of duty, of what monopoly she was telling then?

Cloud gaming? Duopoly and oligopoly (see healthcare) being also anticompetitive? Look, of course Sony also opposed to merger because it was a competitor. Every antitrust lawsuit is bound to attract some of them. I dunno what you're going off on here.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 4 months ago

Cancelled my Proton subscription citing this as the reason. Hope others do the same. This administration is not normal and relations should never be normalized with them.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

This is not an ad
Enter email to receive emails

I disagree, Mr Website.

[–] asap@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I've been looking in to degoogling and was considering Protonmail before this. Does anybody know of a good alternative? Espeically one that lets you have multiple email addresses?

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I bit the bullet this month & bought a domain so I can assign mail handling and change providers without changing my email address. Currently using https://purelymail.com/ because they're $10/year for as many addresses & domains as you want "within reason." It's apparently just one guy with some AWS instances, but it was very straightforward to set up.

[–] smitten@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Well good thing I just switched to mxroute

+1 to mxroute for anyone thinking about it.

Been using it for a while (and worked with the guy who runs it) and it's been pretty much perfect.

[–] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

MXroute doesn't cater to users who require end-to-end encryption, advanced privacy features, or those who need built-in security measures beyond standard email protocols, as it's primarily focused on reliable email delivery and hosting rather than security-first communication.

Tuta would be a viable alternative to Proton.

[–] smitten@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago

No they don’t, but I never switched to proton for that. I switched to proton to get away from iCloud. I also never loved the idea of them keeping my gpg key in the cloud, I can just as easily do e2e with mxroute in a more secure way

[–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

security measures beyond standard email protocols

Doesn't exist. The only security you can have is if you use OpenPGP. Everything else is marketing and lies.

Came here to follow up with this.

I don't care what magic beans my email provider wants to sell, at the end of the day they're only able to do encryption within their own server which is pointless.

Anyone who thinks email is not immediately plain-text when they hit the send button (because, frankly, it is) is suffering from some weird marketing-induced delusion, or just plain doesn't understand that proton encrypting something, or SSL in transit is not going to do a single damn thing to improve security.

Sure my copy of an email is all nice and secure, but the other copy of it almost certainly not, unless you use something like GPG to force the contents to be transmitted encrypted, and fucking nobody uses GPG outside of very limited situations.

[–] smitten@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago

Agreed. I also notice proton stores your gpg keys in the cloud, unlocked by your account password.