this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

15532 readers
258 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Charlxmagne@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

All these braindead silicon valley tech bros trynna reinvent existing solutions to problems in very expensive and unnecessary ways, marketing it as "revolutionary" and "groundbreaking"

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The majority of our oxygen comes from algae, they aren’t reinventing existing solutions they just put a tank of them in a city and blow air into it so that a city can use the same more efficient fauna that is available in coastal cities

[–] NichtElias@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I believe algae are flora, not fauna

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You are absolutely correct and that was a stupid on my part

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 0 points 2 months ago

Mistakes aren't stupid, they are human. Hell we are even making our AI in our own image now...

[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Trees take ages to grow, and their root systems damage buildings and pavements.

[–] Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago

Also really really hard to keep trees alive on the sides of buildings where these units could conceivably be used. Modular trees plus trees where we can fit them.

[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago

But the shade of a tree is far superior and reduces the overall temperature around them if many are planted, so overall much better.

Also certain trees dont need deep roots and can grow without neccessairliy damaging the pavement.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 months ago

You can take trees and replant them in the city, you don't have to grow it there. There are tree farms.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

The problem with trees is they are used as lumber. The national parks has always been protected. But Trump has unprotected parts of the national parks to be cut down for lumber.

[–] CaptainHowdy@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Dumb take. If someone crashes their car into one of these, it can be replaced in a few days. Trees take decades to grow in ideal conditions. Between tall buildings in a city is far from ideal conditions.

Also algae is way more efficient at converting CO2 into O2; I think it's maybe multiple times more efficient using the same amount of light.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Dumb take, by the guy who has no idea how much it costs to maintain these tanks or any understanding of the scales involved, all while wanting to live in a world of green goo in tanks instead of one with trees in their cities.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

As an emergency responder, I can say with confidence that when a car hits a tree, it's rare that the car wins. The tree usually just shrugs it off.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I would support legislation that mandated these be used around the highest carbon emitting facilities. Maybe a few very well designed structures (algae tanks) in very densely populated cities.

These would be in no way a replacement for trees in a community but, I could see forcing the corporations to use them. Such as those that must pollute because, they can not manufacture these products without polluting.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (5 children)

The issue with trees is you need to adapt the city to them, you can't adapt them to the city. And people have proven once and again that they would invent anything to not move by an inch when our way of life is put in question.

So we push forward with absurd solutions one after the other: carbon capture, atmospheric geo-engineering, a damned nuke in antarctica, and now "liquid trees".

Because the alternative is to change our ways, and we can't face that.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago

trees take don't come with actual requirement lists. An algae pool can and will come with explicit instructions that are able to be met and won't destroy the sidewalk for no reason.

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I would be fine with changing my ways if changing my anything didn’t require endless paperwork. How is it fair that some guy invents agriculture and now I have to have a credit score

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Few things about trees in cities: (1) tree roots ruin sidewalks because they upend that stuff; (2) tree roots get into and ruin infrastructure, (3) not every curb can sustain a tree, so these could fit where a tree could not; and (4) they damage stuff when thet fall over in storms.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Crazy thought - instead of just putting trees near curbs, have dedicated green spaces in cities where there aren't sidewalks or other important infrastructure near the trees.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Where did you get these ideas you freak

[–] captainjaneway@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Parks? Gross. I like parking lots.

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

How about multi level parking garages teeming with algae?

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Why not both green spaces (central park anyone?) and these alge pods everywhere else?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The issue with trees is you need to adapt the city to them, you can't adapt them to the city. And people have proven once and again that they would invent anything to not move by an inch when our way of life is put in question.

So we push forward with absurd solutions one after the other: carbon capture, atmospheric geo-engineering, a damned nuke in antarctica, and now "liquid trees".

Because the alternative is to change our ways, and we can't face that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

These algae also produce biogas that can be used for heating or producing electricity.

[–] BottleCaptain@lemmy.pt 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Damn if only trees created something gaseous that was useful

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›