this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
141 points (98.0% liked)

Linux Gaming

16833 readers
455 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Because GOG doesn't want to support it. They'd rather the community do it.

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 1 points 2 days ago
[–] eldain@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago

Marginal support happens a lot on Linux. See AMD drivers without Adrenaline. "You may use Linux if you must... at your own risk... we do the bare minimum to keep you runnig... our past stuff is in the open but we can pull the rug on future releases any time." You can install gog games and maybe some dude made galaxy work in wine, corporate has decided that is good enough.

[–] Lemmist@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is UI for GOG? We have a Heroic Game Launcher. It can work with GOG.

[–] formerlytomato@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago

I get into this on the post, but AFAIK community-built solutions such as Heroic and Lutris aren't exactly the same, with a lot of Galaxy's selling points being the cloud features such as save data sync and a friends list system for online play.

Different people may or may not find uses for these features, but it's still worth discussing IMO.

[–] BlueSquid0741@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe the author of the article/blog doesn’t know about Heroic?

They mention lutris, but note that it isn’t a functional equivalent to Galaxy. But as far as I’m aware, Heroic is (correct me if I’m wrong, I haven’t seen Galaxy in action).

[–] sibachian@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago

I found Heroic today. Same games that won't run on Lutris won't run on Heroic either. The biggest disappointment was that it crashed a few times and I gave up entirely when it froze up. I'm not saying Lutris is flawless, it certainly isn't, but my experience overall has at least been acceptable.

[–] Durandal@lemmy.today 0 points 2 days ago (9 children)

IIRC GOG is actually partnered with HeroicLauncher... so.. it's semi official to use that... and better UX.

[–] iusearchbtw@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

heroic has no download throttling, very annoying for shared/shitty networks and large games

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If you're on Linux, you have a lot more options to affect the system. You could try running Heroic Launcher through trickle: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/34116/how-can-i-limit-the-bandwidth-used-by-a-process

Ideally this would be implemented on the client side, i.e. Heroic Launcher, but there seems to some challenges in making that happen: https://github.com/Heroic-Games-Launcher/HeroicGamesLauncher/issues/597

[–] iusearchbtw@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

bit late to this, but trickle doesn't work because heroic spawns new downloader processes unaffected by trickle's limits

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Hm, if it spawns some external process, would it be possible to wrap that in a shell script of the same name (and have its dir earlier in PATH), which in turn calls the other one, but through trickle?

[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago

Better UX is a big word, as any unofficial launcher it kinda sucks because it doesn’t have a specific feature set. Besides, first party support is always better

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today -1 points 2 days ago

That's neat to learn

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] rocky1138@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

We don't need third party launchers to buy or play their games. Why do you want this?

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Besides what the other person said, there's also the whole treating Linux users as second class citizens. If they didn't had a launcher for Windows, then it wouldn't be that big of a problem, but the fact that they did created a launcher for Windows years ago and porting it to Linux has been the most upvoted feature request since then and they haven't done it is a slap in the face of a community that shares a lot of their beliefs. Valve is investing money on making Linux gaming a reality, GoG won't even port their launcher to Linux, despite not caring for a launcher I know who I'm giving my money.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -1 points 2 days ago

If third party launchers were as good as the first party ones, we wouldn't.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because cdpr is a joke. Like did you see cyberpunks release? All they care is about money they showed that with their rushed job. I haven't claimed any free games on GOG because you have to sign up for their newsletter in order to claim the game. I still get spammed with emails from GOG even after unsubscribing after I receive every single email. At this point of just marked em' as spam.

[–] hellofriend@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"rushed job"

8 years of development

I don't know how CP77 turned out how it did, but it certainly wasn't due to being rushed. Either way, they managed to fix it although it took like 2 years or something.

As for you still getting GOG emails... Git gud?? Unsubscribing from a service's emails is the easiest thing in the world if you take roughly 2 seconds to make sure it's done properly.

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah and I fucking unsubscribed and they keep sending me emails and then I unsubscribe again and then they keep sending me emails and then I unsubscribe again and then they keep sending me emails...

You picking up on it yet?

And it was in development longer than 8 years it got rumored I can 2011 or something and then the teaser was 2013 I think I forget hold up I'm fuzzy rn. But you can tell it's a rushed product by the end result. if it needed more time it needed more time end of fucking story

[–] hellofriend@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Then you're doing something wrong, simple as. I've completely unsubscribed from GOG emails and it was ez. Literally just in account settings.

collapsed inline media

As for Cyberpunk, it entered pre-pro in 2016 and released in 2020. https://www.destructoid.com/how-long-was-cyberpunk-2077-in-development/ So really 4 years, so maybe rushed given the scale tbh. If they had released in 2022 it might have been in a better state, so I'll concede there.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›