this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

14393 readers
65 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 0 points 3 days ago

We have so many abrasive motherfucking birbs the fact it's not a corvid is a blessing

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Here's the thing. You said a "jackdaw is a crow."

Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that.

As someone who is a scientist who studies crows, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls jackdaws crows. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing.

If you're saying "crow family" you're referring to the taxonomic grouping of Corvidae, which includes things from nutcrackers to blue jays to ravens.

So your reasoning for calling a jackdaw a crow is because random people "call the black ones crows?" Let's get grackles and blackbirds in there, then, too.

Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It's not one or the other, that's not how taxonomy works. They're both. A jackdaw is a jackdaw and a member of the crow family. But that's not what you said. You said a jackdaw is a crow, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the crow family crows, which means you'd call blue jays, ravens, and other birds crows, too. Which you said you don't.

It's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know?

[–] JackRiddle@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is this that copypasta from the guy?

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 3 days ago

Unidan, yeah

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The bird was named for its similarity in colouration to the Eurasian magpie; it was a common practice for early settlers to name plants and animals after European counterparts.[11] However, the Eurasian magpie is a member of the Corvidae, while its Australian counterpart is placed in the family Artamidae (although both are members of a broad corvid lineage).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_magpie

TL;DR: bird law is confusing and best left to the experts

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But would Becky let him smash? Asking the real questions here!?!

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Idk, does he have any blue?

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 0 points 3 days ago

He got blue, he got yellow, he got whatever you want (that he can get) :-P

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This is outravous

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 days ago

What about bluejays? Corvids you know.

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Honestly I think of bluejays and the rest of the family as crows, too. They're the blue crows. Crows are true crows, but magpies and bluejays and all them are still crows, to me.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 0 points 2 days ago

Australian magpies have a much nicer song than any corvid