this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
705 points (99.4% liked)

politics

23183 readers
2772 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Republicans were, though, more likely to believe Russian disinformation claims than their Democratic counterparts, with 57.6% falling for at least one Russian disinformation claim, compared with just 17.9% of Democrats and 29.5% of people who didn't identify with one particular party.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 155 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

The headline should read "Republicans believe misinformation to an alarming degree"?

Sure the numbers aren't great for independents and Democrats... but it isn't >50% bad, which clearly points to Republican ideology as brain worms.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 89 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Exactly. That's why I highlighted that portion.

~60% vs ~20% is a staggering difference. This really shows the much bigger problem of how conservatives gain power. They use the large masses of unintelligent, manipulative gullible people to get votes, and enrich themselves.

This is not freedom. This is not democracy. It's psychopaths, controlling and keeping people stupid, so they can stay in power and wealth.

Our system is so fucked.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Anyone who has ever talked to a Republican knows this. Whenever you point out half the bullshit coming out of their mouth has been debunked, they just spout some bullshit about the MSM and source being "biased". Friend, reality is biased against your 🤡 ass.

[–] Tortl@lemm.ee 17 points 3 days ago

Literally every time. I'm so sick of giving people (conservatives) the benefit of the doubt when they talk about something I haven't heard of and realize that yes, in fact, this current issue they're crying about is also made up or wildly misinterpreted just like every other issue they've ever pretended to care about.

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The funny thing is the electoral college was created to protect us from this, but it's kinda the whole reason we're where we are.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Uh, no. The electoral college was created because the slavers wanted representation for their slaves without giving them the vote.

Edit: Source

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

No. The electoral college was created because the founders didn't trust the uneducated general population to not elect a tyrant, so the EC was supposed to be made up of educated people who wouldn't be stupid enough to vote against the best interests of the people.

It also had a bit to do with how long it took to count votes at the time.

Are you sure you're not thinking about the 3/5 compromise?

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

See the source I posted in the edit.

[–] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

That article says it was created to prevent a populist president, and that it should've been scrapped after the 12th amendment but the 3/5 compromise incentivized the South to keep it.

The Federalist Papers talk about this a bit and slavery was not a concern.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 days ago

Yes, this level of control over how the populace thinks is a step along the path toward turning human beings into livestock. I'm not fond of it.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Republicans live in a world of lies in their Fox News + Church bubble.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (12 children)

I do think that is giving liberals and the left too much credit.

A lot of the infighting from among the left during the past election felt pretty artificial, to be perfectly honest, and most of the "Genocide Joe/Holocaust Harris" types seemed to just evaporate after the election ended. Maybe just because there was nothing really left to say after all was said and done, but I just find it hard to believe much of that discourse was in good faith. I'm surprised to read a number as low as 18%, but almost 1 in 5 still isn't nothing.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] uienia@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

*disinformation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gandhi70@lemmy.world 70 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Not only Americans. This is a global problem...

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But it's amplified in countries with undemocratic election systems, like first past the post. You just need a plurality of morons to fuck it up for everybody else.

[–] Gandhi70@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

True. But even in a state with a good election system the right wing nuts are on the rise.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Enough to elect a Russian agent, twice

[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It was alarming the first time around. It isn't now. This country is filled with blissfully stupid people.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

KGB handbook describes this in great detail. Amplify and boost the loudest, worst voices on both sides of every political and social issue, so that people hate each other and everyone thinks the worst of each other, thus embracing the worst image the other side has of each other.

Further, by making literally every issue, no matter how small, into a contentious debate where you can't tell what's real or not, the average voter or citizen just starts to tune it all out.

Why do you think the general public is abandoning science and basic liberal democracy? Why do you think people suddenly seem to not care about basic empathy or rights for fellow citizens?

They've all tuned out, they don't care anymore because everything is too stupid, too nonsensical, too contentious, so the alternative is to buy whatever the leadership says, keep your head down, and get back to work. Welcome to the end of the cold war. Victory to Russia.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 28 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Americans Also Believe American Disinformation ‘To Alarming Degree'

Actually Americans tend to easily believe a lot of nonsense .... and have a harder time grasping reality.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

While true, American stupidity is not unique. Every nation has shown that they have tons of idiots willing to believe whatever the Internet tells them

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Yep. Poilievre, Brexit, Meloni, AFD, just off the top of my head.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago (2 children)

An alarming amount of Americans still believe civil war disinformation and propaganda. They ain't got the critical thinking skills to deal with 250 year old shit, they sure as hell can't think past new shit

[–] nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

What civil war propaganda? Where can I read more about this?

Edit: States rights, ofc. I was thinking there might be something more obscure and specific because I hadn't heard of most of the falsehoods in the article before.

[–] MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

"The civil war wasn't about slavery, it was about states rights"

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For example, the confederate supporters say the war wasn't about slavery, but rather about states rights. Now, you ask, states rights to what? And then they don't have an answer somehow.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well, an alarming number of Americans believe that Trump should be president. And that America is the best country in the world, and that compassion is communism.

This tells more about how gullible Americans are, and not much about the skills of unchecked Russian propaganda.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago

It probably sounds so familiar to fox viewers

[–] LarryLurkman@lemm.ee 16 points 2 days ago

Fucking pathetic.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

So much of what is being flagged as "Russian disinformation" is being parroted (if not straight up propagated) by western news media, western social media, and western talking heads.

At what point does a Mercer-funded, MAGA-coded, Texas based, English language broadcast constitute American Media? Is this a "just one drop" rule, where any positive (or insufficiently negative) news item or talking point or image marks the entire operation as "Russian"? Are guys like Tim Pool and Alex Jones still Americans? Or are they Russian? Is Tucker Carlson, the son of a CIA director and a midwestern cattle-country heiress, a Presidential speechwriter and US cable news pundit and avowed Cold Warrior, a Russian? Is CNN Russian? Is Exxon Russian?

[–] borf@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

If I sing the Russian national anthem it doesn't become an American anthem because an American is repeating the words

Edit: you cant muddy the water fuckface. Russian propaganda is still Russian propaganda idiot

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 days ago

If any population needs help with media literacy, it's Murcans and Canucks.

So many people are repeating Putin's narratives that even anti-cons are believing them.

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

collapsed inline media

*read and analyze content critically

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

thanks to the right wing media lying to American people for decades this has become a reality

[–] TheLunatic@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago

No. Shit. It's infuriating.

[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Gullibility appears to cut across party lines, with respondents identifying as Democrats just as likely as Republicans to believe at least one of the 10 false claims.

Republicans were, though, more likely to believe Russian disinformation claims than their Democratic counterparts, with 57.6% falling for at least one Russian disinformation claim, compared with just 17.9% of Democrats and 29.5% of people who didn't identify with one particular party.

I looked at the 10 false claims used for the test. Most of them were ridiculously easy to dismiss as false. The only one I had difficulty with was identifying whether social security cuts were part of "Project 2025" agenda, due to the agenda being very extensive (the source says 922 pages) and me not living in a country that it's about. Thus I'd have answered "not sure". I'd have also answered "not sure" about the birth place of some terrorist.

If people stumble on these, people are really poorly informed or unable / unwilling to inform themselves.

Some guesses.

  • the US media environment is very entertainment-focused?

  • the US education system leaves things to be desired?

  • the US population spends a high amount of time in social media echo chambers?

  • do Republicans spend more of online time in bot-infested places?

  • do they have lower bot recognition and fact checking skills?

  • are they drinking the kool-aid because their great leader drank it, so it seems legit?

In general, propaganda works. That's why people pay for it. When you have a delicate equilibrium and you can push it past the tipping point with little effort, that's the most economical way of disabling an opponent. :( Using force would require a spending a trillion, but using disinformation, you can get outcomes with a tiny amount.

Russia is spending significant amounts on promulgating misinformation in the U.S. Last year, for example, the U.S. Department of Justice indicted two people for funneling nearly $10 million through a Tennessee-based content creation company to publish misinformation about Ukraine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Many of the supposed "leaders" are spouting Russian disinfo - Hegseth the other day was crying about the media talking about the "Russian hoax", meaning, reporting on donvict's sus ties to Putin and Russia in his first term.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago

The "Russian Hoax" is a hoax.

HitlerPig's ties to Putin and Russia are well-documented, all the way back to his first visit to Soviet Moscow in 1987, BEFORE the fall of the Iron Curtain, when the Soviets were shocked at how easily he could be manipulated with the most insincere flattery, and he was given the code-name designation Krasnov.

Within six months of his first visit, he was taking out his first full page ads spouting Soviet talking points.

By any objective measure, HitlerPig is the most prolific Traitor in American history, worse than all other American traitors COMBINED.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

on reddit i pointed out in political subs so many times that alot of the posters were russian trolls positng russian back news to bait people. cant you people see its obvious. around the time of the gaza invasion, i reported a couple people in the pics sub for israeli propaganda, because they were posting the " attacks against palestine" as a way to frame bidenw as the sole cause of the conflict and hes doing nothing, i reminded them that both parties have always supported in great numbers, and its only currently being inflammed because BIBI was worried a new D was going to condemn or stop the financial support to israel.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago

Speaking of disinformation, here's the underlying article: https://www.newsguardrealitycheck.com/p/one-third-of-americans-believe-russian-disinformation-yougov-survey-finds. In case you want to skip Forbes.

load more comments
view more: next ›