this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Canada

10150 readers
586 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Misinformation is not welcome here.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As the gambling industry continues to grow globally with the rise of online gambling, a recent report from the medical journal The Lancet's commission on gambling calls is calling on governments to approach gambling as a public health issue.

Malcolm Sparrow, one of the authors of the report, says this will put gambling in the same category as alcohol and tobacco, which are identified by the World Health Organization as issues of the public interest.

Statistics Canada estimates that in 2018, nearly two-thirds of Canadians gambled in the past year. The data estimates that about 300,000 Canadians were at moderate-to-severe risk of developing a gambling problem, where gambling starts to negatively affect a person's life.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca -2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

What do Gambling, Social Media, Video Games, and Pornography all have in common?

They aren't the problem, Dopamine is.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Alright, just ban dopamine /s

Your comment gives off serious "I am very smart" vibes

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca -2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The point is not to ban anything simply because people are, or can become, addicted to it.

[–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

right, so instead of killing the problem at the root, we just allow it to flourish and nip off the bad buds over and over even if that doesn't fix the issue....

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca -2 points 8 months ago

This isn't killing the problem at the root.

The root of the problem is a complete lack of care for people with addictions and mental health issues. No amount of regulation will help the root when it does not involve increase addictions and mental health care spaces.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Neither alcohol nor tobacco are banned in Canada, and this is asking to put online gambling on the same level.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Gambling is already regulated in Canada.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Neither alcohol nor tobacco are banned in Canada, and this is asking to put online gambling on the same level.

If this is asking for gambling to be on the same level as alcohol and tobacco, does that not imply gambling isn't on the same regulatory level as the others?

[–] Laser@feddit.org 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. They're all regulated. But gambling (addiction) is not an official "public health issue". As the linked paper states:

First, gambling is a public health issue. In setting policy, governments should give priority to protecting health and wellbeing over competing economic motivations.

It's not a call to start regulating gambling, but to change the way to look at it and act accordingly.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca -2 points 8 months ago

Gambling regulation in all countries, regardless of legal status, to reduce exposure and availability of gambling, provide affordable and universal support and treatment for gambling harms, and to de-normalize gambling.

Looks like it is exactly a call to start regulating gambling to me.

[–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Is that supposed to be an insult?

Try saying something meaningful next time so you don't feel the need to spam my inbox 4 day old troll.

[–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

please tell me how your comment provided anything of worth that is in this realm of reality?

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca -2 points 8 months ago

How about you crawl back under your bridge instead?

[–] streetfestival@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Nah, predatory capitalism is the problem

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca -2 points 8 months ago

Capitalism simply gives people the dopamine they crave in whatever way they choose or are told they want to get it.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Dopamine is not the problem. Corrupt and incompetent government is.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca -2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

How exactly is the "Corrupt and incompetent government" responsible for people getting addicted to something?

[–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm going to go off a limb and assume your a sweet summer child and were not aware of the smoking ads in the past.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca -2 points 8 months ago

I am going to assume you like the smell of your own farts, based on the condescending tone of your comment, and are not aware that people still start smoking without advertisements for cigarettes.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A total lack of regulation and a wold view so far behind reality that they cant even identify problems until years after they occur.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca -2 points 8 months ago

Why is the Government responsible for regulating an adult activity beyond age restricting that activity?

[–] streetfestival@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's an easy one. For example, by allowing the marketing or product to be unduly attractive to children

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca -2 points 8 months ago

How does one market something in a way that isn't attractive to anyone between the ages of 0 and 17?