Maybe illegally revoking the citizenship of people we don't like is a bad thing?
The sort of thing they want to do?
What's going on Canada?
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
🏒 Sports
Hockey
Football (NFL): incomplete
Football (CFL): incomplete
Baseball
Basketball
Soccer
💻 Schools / Universities
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
🗣️ Politics
🍁 Social / Culture
Rules
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
Maybe illegally revoking the citizenship of people we don't like is a bad thing?
The sort of thing they want to do?
No it's only fascist when other people do it.
/s
I am a little worried how many people don't see any issue with this kinda thing.
There's no legal path to revoking Musk's citizenship.
Trump wanted to revoke the citizenship of people he didn't like too, why is this any better?
There’s no legal path to revoking Musk’s citizenship.
Apparently, there are a few (SOURCE):
Musk is an active enemy of this country, and is taking part at a government level with power to cause harm to this country.
It's our duty to do something.
I'm pretty sure the portion of the Act that site refers to was repealed in 2017.
Canadian citizens who (are alleged to) have committed treason should be tried under to Canadian law, and there's no reason to invent loopholes to avoid having to put someone on trial.
Canadian citizens who (are alleged to) have committed treason should be tried under to Canadian law, and there’s no reason to invent loopholes to avoid having to put someone on trial.
Should we wait before or after we become part of the States to make that determination? He and his lap dog are actively working to annex this country.
"We don't have time to put people on trial" is not a take I'm prepared to get behind.
And even if it were...how would revoking his citizenship change any of what you just described?
Present the evidence in court against Musk with lawyers under cross examination to point out fallacies in evidence.