People Twitter

8443 readers

2195 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1778

In the end, The Hill lied and Harris was right. (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Loduz_247@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

160 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Link https://archive.ph/lk6HY

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 24 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It was an opinion piece by a guest columnist.

That an editor then chose to publish. What's your point?

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Nearly every respectable major news outlet that has commentary tries to invite commentary from multiple sides. They also probably didn't know what he would become or his ulterior motives.

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Nearly every respectable major news outlet that has commentary tries to invite commentary from multiple sides.

Maybe that's part of the issue though?

If Jimmy Allred says it’s raining, and W. Lee O’Daniel says it isn’t raining, Texas newspapermen quote them both, and don’t look out the window to see which is lying, and to tell the readers what the truth is at the moment.

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago

I'm really torn on that. Because I want media to be unbiased, but I also want media to tell the truth.

Most media will simply report the truth of what other people say is the truth.

I suppose I'd opt for unbias over bias if those were the two options.