this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
670 points (98.7% liked)
People Twitter
7595 readers
861 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If you read the article, the rules were only that both parties have to agree on a test and if someone passed the test they won the prize. There wasn't a "gotcha" clause like "Oh since you did it it's clearly allowed by physics and we don't have to pay up!" So like if someone showed they had psychic powers sufficient to pass an agreed upon test it doesn't matter if there's a natural explanation for it, they would have still won the prize.
Well, in seriousness, and more interestingly, I'm not really willing to call supernatural powers real or fake, currently. There exist some stories I've come across, which are likely real, which contain absolutely unexplainable phenomenon. Just this morning, someone in a Discord I'm in (who wouldn't just fake stories) was explaining how someone they knew had a psychotic break on psychedelics, and, in the ambulance, narrated the paramedics' childhoods with disturbing accuracy. A trusted moderator of that space responded to my skepticism with "psychics absolutely exist, but the vast majority are just grifters".
Note: Without getting into all the context, this moderator is not the kind of person to simply believe in conspiracy theories.
I used to be a Reddit atheist (ew), and I've gone from thinking I know everything, to being very serious about accepting different views--no matter how absurd. We're unaware of so many more things than we're aware of.
I'm of the opinion that if psychic abilities exist, they can not be on command. They might. They might not. I would rather be honest than claim to be factual--I don't know.
I think it’s entirely possible this person is being honest while also just not having a firm grasp over what actually happened, due to having a psychotic break from psychedelics. The paramedic simply agreeing to whatever they said (if the conversation did happen—I’ve been unsure whether a conversation I thought I had was real or not just from smoking too much weed) could have been interpreted as much deeper and more profound than it was.
None of this requires ill intent. The mind is just incredibly bad at making and retrieving memories in the way we want (infallible, like a video) even when you aren’t on drugs.
It could also just be cold reading. People who haven't been exposed to that can find it eerily accurate, even though it's just a combination of random guessing with reinforcing the guesses that got reactions. It's the kind of thing that both parties could participate in without either being explicitly familiar with the technique.