this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)

Greentext

6654 readers
1253 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] boletus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

None at all, and the real argument wasn't that females is a dirty toxic word. It's the context in which it is used.

[โ€“] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 1 month ago

The context in OP where females was used inoffensively?

You haven't pinned down the problem with the context of the word: I don't think you can. All I think you have are opinions & assumptions unsupported by context.

Either the context or the word has a problem. If it's not the context, then it's the word, which means we're really arguing about treating females as a dirty, toxic word.

If it is the context, then you can identify that problem (in a way that clearly sets it apart from inoffensive uses of the noun female): it's puzzling no one has so far.