this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2025
370 points (98.7% liked)

Selfhosted

46671 readers
318 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's free, and I see an official Github repository containing the code, is that not foss?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Source code doesn't make it foss

Windows XP is open source by that definition

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

By the acronym, opening up the source code to the public would make it open source. What is Grayjay missing to be open source then? Accepting contributions?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No, that's not how it works. It is source available

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I understand what you're saying. What would make GrayJay open source? Allowing for community contribution?

Edit: I looked it up thanks to your unhelpfullness, and open source seems to mean making the code available for the community to use, modify, and share, which Grayjay seems to do. I'm pretty sure I'm right here, but I do want to hear your definition and argument. Is your issue that the license doesn't allow others to make money using the source code?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

Open source/libre/foss all have to do with the license. Grayjay doesn't have a license that meets the criteria because it places arbitrary restrictions on the code.

It has nothing to do with contributions. You can ship the code on a CD and that is totally fine as long as it has the proper license.