this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
5 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

13164 readers
398 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
5
fuck this (mander.xyz)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Apparantly, (in the US) any protest that needs to occupy the road requires a permit. Yea imagine how stupid it is, you want to protest the government and you need to apply for permission?!? I was shocked when my teacher told me about this. Seems like a huge First Amendment violation to me, but society just goes along with it. πŸ˜“

So unless your protest is strictly on the sidewalk, you need a permit. So fucking dumb.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 0 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Public roadways are for travel.

[–] cheers_queers@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (9 children)

that's literally why blocking roads in protest is so effective. enough angry calls to the mayor office due to people being late for work etc, is how protesting puts pressure on representatives to actually represent the people.

or did you think that huddling on sidewalks holding signs was supposed to do something?

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Blocking roads in protest has proven effective at exactly one thing: Increasing the enforcement and penalties for jaywalking.

It is counterproductive at everything else.

did you think that huddling on sidewalks holding signs was supposed to do something?

Where did I say huddle on sidewalks?

I think JSO should be firebombing ICE car dealerships, gas stations, muffler shops, and other entities and agents of the oil industry. Not harassing victims of that industry.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Blocking roads in protest has proven effective at exactly one thing: Increasing the enforcement and penalties for jaywalking.

Well... no.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Excellent retort, but I can cite the legislative record supporting my point.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I can cite many news articles which show that protesting in this way is more effective.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

No doubt, no doubt. There are plenty of articles claiming JSO protests are effective.

Of course, if they were actually effective, you wouldn't need to point to news articles promoting the virtues of standing around in the street. You'd be able to point to oil consumption rates. If their protests were actually effective, oil consumption rates would be falling.

The reality is that those articles do nothing but make you feel good, like something is being done. But reality doesn't care about feelings, or the fiddling articles designed to make us feel good while the world burns.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If that is the only metric you are looking it, kind of. It slumped during COVID and has looked like it's tailing off somewhat. Without tax breaks, subsidies and support for other forms of transport, say, we will not shake our dependence.

But, we can look at specific countries and see if those things have helped on a national scale, like Norway, for example, which has seen consumption decline since 2018. And Sweden. And Japan. And Germany. And...

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Norway, for example, which has seen consumption decline since 2018.

They started obstructing traffic in 2022, not 2018. Norway's consumption has increased, significantly, since they began obstructing traffic.

Japan's decline since then is commensurate with its population decline. Germany's and Sweden's are flat. UK is up even more than Norway.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I am telling you when their trend started. Norway's consumption has not increased, it is down on 2018, as I said. It had a slight decline in 2023 (the increase between 2020 and 2022 is when people stopped driving during COVID then came back to restart its downward trend).

Japan’s decline since then is commensurate with its population decline.

Actually no, if you know what commensurate means. The population has dropped around 4% since 2008, yet oil consumption has been decreasing since 1996.

Germany is similar in terms of consumption, Sweden likewise.

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/oil-consumption-by-country

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop

JSO didn't exist in 1996 or 2008 or 2018 or 2020. It was founded in 2022.

You're giving JSO traffic obstructions credit for declines that happened decades before they came into existence, and in countries where they havent actually disrupted traffic.

You're giving them credit for "declines" that have actually been increases since the time they started regularly obstructing traffic in 2022.

Obstructing traffic is not an effective means of protest. Target actual agents and entities associated with the oil industry, not the victims.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)