this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
408 points (99.3% liked)

Buy European

6023 readers
243 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] iii@mander.xyz 95 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Every year they try to push this same shit with a new name. One day there will be a reichstag fire and it will be passed.

So fucking transparant, yet I don't see a way to stop them.

[โ€“] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The rough quote is, we have to win against this every time. They only have to win once.

[โ€“] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Pretty straightforward: join anarchist groups like the ccc and the fau, vote radical left and tell everyone you know to do the exact same. It already helps in some areas, just keep doing it.

[โ€“] KumaSudosa@feddit.dk 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And how do you ensure that the "radical left" doesn't support surveillance measures? Not like the ideology has a good track record on that matter.

[โ€“] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You mean like every other government? I dont. Radical leftists stand for human rights. Of course there is a chance that they get coopted. But every other political ideology does not need to get coopted to oppress people.

[โ€“] KumaSudosa@feddit.dk 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most moderate anything government doesn't even begin to come anywhere close to the control of a "radical" leftist state.

What is your basis for "radical" leftists standing for human rights? Radical leftists are rarely liberally minded. I don't disagree that many left-wing parties stand for decency, environmental protection, and various rights - but "radicals" do not.

[โ€“] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You are making assumptions. It shows that you dont have any idea of leftism.

The idea of leftism is that people (and animals in most cases) are the same and deserve their needs met.

You can criticize the measures taken to ensure this, especially in capitalist societies where you may have to use force to break capitalist resistance. If all you ever knew is rape, being disallowed to rape can feel repressive. But its still okay to repress it.

And it is okay to disagree on this. Thats why we have both anarchists and marxists. Massively simplified, one party wants to mentally arm the population and push for a self educating, politically mature population. The other one wants to change the system from the top and reeducate the public on cooperation and classless society while forcefully repressing the regressive ideas.

They both actually want the same, communism. The classless, stateless society.

Of course that is an ideal, a utopia that might never be real but the millions of people dying under capitalism every year and the exploited people all over the world, the exploited planet that is starting to kick us out are WAY worse than all that has been seen before. The strongest argument for marxism is the limited time we have before we will just die out (starting with those who already are exploited the most today).

[โ€“] endeavor@sopuli.xyz -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

no thanks, no person who waves around hammer and cycle gives two shits about betterment of mankind, the same way someone waving a swastika around does not.

[โ€“] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Interesting take. What makes you say that?

[โ€“] endeavor@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

the insane number of atrocities and murders commited under the hammer and cycle flag and the modern commies love of whitewashing and apologizing for it. Nobody who wants the world to be better for everyone would not call themselves a communist.

[โ€“] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Okay. So you dont mean communism or socialism, you are talking about a symbol. So if one took lets say, a wave, would it be okay then to have people housed and fed?

[โ€“] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I get you dont think eastern europeans are real people and their lives or suffering matters but commies are same as nazis to us: they both want to mass murder.

Why the fuck would anyone who is not selfish rally behind a symbol of oppression, mass murder, authoritarianism, war, propaganda and economic decline? If you have no issues waving hammer and cycle around, you have issues.

[โ€“] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nice ad hominem bro.

I have family from eastern europe. I also have family from east germany.

You know what they say? You know what the majority of the people who lived that era say? Its much worse now.

People using stalin and national socialism to discredit the idea of communism and socialism need to start reading books. Its really important to start having actual discussions without personally attacking folks. These shortcirtuited propaganda ridden hateposts wont convince me and they wond convince anyone who is able to read a book.

People in eastern germany, infamously, didnt have bananas most of the year. You know what they also didnt have? Homeless people, starving people. Today that is the case A LOT.

Of course it was interesting and promising for people to come to western germany from socialist or communist countries back then. But its not because they had to fear for their lives because they couldnt afford to pay the rent or their food.

The most important part is that authoritarian governments are not what leftism is about, its not what socialism or communism is about.

Here's interesting stuff from a pretty reliable source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Scare

Have fun reading. It will help.

[โ€“] endeavor@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Socialism is good, everyone deserves the same opportunities and safety net.

You cant remove communism for the mass murder. You cant forget the people starved to death or worked to death in name of communism. Fuck everyone waving that flag the same way fuck everyone waving a nazi flag. If that offends you, go cry.

[โ€“] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I get that you're triggered but it is not okay to attack other people like this.

Please read a book. It will help you. Get off the internet for a moment and start reading. Understand what people mean when they say communism instead of trying to get them to shut up. We will never shut up. You will always get triggered and hurt other people. That is literally what we are trying to stop.

The definition of communism is the classless, stateless society. You're not even referencing anything in particular. What you - i think - are talking about is stalinism. That i havent been too much into yet. I have heard about the infamous gulags which apparently have been horrendous.

Btw its also illegal in the country i live in to compare what the nazis in the holocausy did with anything else. We call it holocaust relativism.

[โ€“] endeavor@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I get its now cool to wave around symbols of mass murder regimes and stomp all over those who were murdered in the name of it on lemmy.

Since when its okay to not call out apologists for systems that have historically lead to mass fucking murder and countless atrocities beyond human comprehension every single time?

You're all morals and no facts. Nobody said murder, let alone mass murder would be okay.

You dont like the symbol i get it.

Now stop with the strawmen. Its not what is happening here.

[โ€“] klao@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I didn't know about those groups, thanks for bringing light to it although I'd be wary of voting radical left unless the alternative is only a right-winger

collapsed inline media

[โ€“] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"Wary" of radical left why exactly?

[โ€“] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Radical right and radical left. You should be wary of both of them because they are radical.

  • Radical plans often need to be enforced to be accepted
  • Enforcing political will is authoritarian.
  • I'm anti-authoritarian above everything else.
[โ€“] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah, a "centrist". So how much killing of people is central enough for you? How much genocide?

The idea of "radical = bad" is a trick. It's got zero to do with reality.

Example: depending on where you ask, radical means entirely different things. Read about the overtone window.

That said, radical leftism is about human rights. It is about destroying hierarchies between people. In short it means: everyone gets what they need and does what they can. Or "food, water, housing are inalienable rights."

The radical right is about superiorism. White power, discrimination and ultimately destruction of what they view as "lesser" be it people who look different, have different ancestral history etc.

And you think its smart to compromise between the two? I suggest reading books.

[โ€“] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So how much killing of people is central enough for you? How much genocide?

Very non-radical actions you asking me to support.

From all of that I get that you're someone who thinks it's left Vs right. Two positions, Two ends of a line. If you're not at one end, you're at the other and what lies in-between (if anything) is grey, cowardly, compromising, compliant lemmings.

..and you're telling me to read books? This is the most juvenile and laziest of political thinking. You need to grow beyond thinking anyone that doesn't agree with you must either be the enemy or a collaborator. At least get past one-dimensional thinking.

And it's the Overton window (not "overtone") after Joseph Overton, a US libertarian and free-market supporter. He came up with the concept to describe how think-tanks should manipulate public opinion to consider what was previously unthinkable, particularly in a free-market direction. Of course, that's all lost now it's become part of pop-politics.

You're funny.

I said we should not compromise on these things, you're trying to make a strawman, and badly.

You started with the left vs right debate and are attacking me ad hominem with it.

Your way of discussion is massively out of line and very condescending.

Also, trying to top my point of the overtone (its not important if i spell it correctly, get over yourself) window is childish, while you're accusing me of being exactly that. That was massively ableist too.

You're the exact reason why people with a brain dont like centrists. They're just fashists undercover. The same attack methods, the same disregard for human rights and decency.

Next you say feminists, vegans or climatechange activists are hurting the cause because they're "too loud". Honestly, people in the thousands die every day because people like you say " what can you do?!" Instead of "maybe we stop that"

Anyway. As you can imagine, i dont allow people with less than decent communication style in my feed. So go spill your poison somewhere else.

[โ€“] klao@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Not in all cases as I said between a radical left and a right-winger you might be better voting for the radical left but why I say to be wary is because of the Horseshoe Theory

If you were to say progressive leftists is where I'd be all for

[โ€“] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The horseshoe theory is bullshit to discredit anti establishement leftists.

The idea of radical leftism is that the capitalist system needs and breeds inequality and the state is its assistant. There is no overlap of fascism and leftism. There is a lot of overlap between fascism and capitalism though.

Dont believe stuff like this. It has been disproven many times.

Radical leftism means in essence:

  • everyone is the same
  • everyone deserves the same satisfaction of their needs
  • a roof over your head, food and drink are inalienable rights

The only thing i would warn of is that just because someone says they are leftist, socialist, communist, anarchist, etc doesnt mean they really are. Examples: national socialists and anarcho capitalists. They're both just using the term and perverting the idea. Then there are radical leftist parties that are lost (like russia apologists).

Of course you need to make an informed decision but yes, radical left all the way.

[โ€“] klao@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Radical leftism means in essence:

  • everyone is the same
  • everyone deserves the same satisfaction of their needs
  • a roof over your head, food and drink are inalienable rights.

Any progressive leftist would agree with those things hence why I'd be all for them and as you said there are exceptions in radical left where they shouldn't be taken seriously

[โ€“] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly. Its just important to understand that horseshoe is not a viable concept. Use specifics instead. No Gos are:

  • russia apologism
  • israel apologism
  • science denial/esotherics
  • selective exclusion from basic rights

One very helpful concept is the tolerance paradox. It states that tolerant treatment of intolerant parties will lead to them dismantling of the tolerant system.

[โ€“] klao@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
  • science denial/esotherics
  • selective exclusion from basic rights

No true progressive leftist would be in for either of the two, but in regards to the other two it can become tricky to know

One very helpful concept is the tolerance paradox

Or simply ignore the gaslightning that tolerance is a paradox and take it as a social contract where both ends must comply, if one won't then you shouldn't take for granted the other should

[โ€“] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fair point. Its crazy that we have to mention this at all.

[โ€“] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The horseshoe theory doesn't apply to every leftist group. You need to gauge and research their backgrounds to see if they're authoritarian first.

[โ€“] klao@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

horseshoe theory doesnโ€™t apply to every leftist group [...] research their backgrounds to see if theyโ€™re authoritarian first

hence why I say to be wary and why I say I'd vote but not in every circumstances though BrainInABox makes fair points against it