this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
418 points (97.9% liked)

Not The Onion

14623 readers
2113 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/26592059

Summary

Donald Trump is upset after King Charles warmly welcomed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at Sandringham, making Trump’s own state visit invitation seem “less special.”

Trump’s allies allegedly asked the British government to intervene, but officials stated the king makes his own decisions.

Relations may also be strained by Trump’s criticism of Canada, where Charles remains head of state.

The U.K. government denied tensions, reaffirming strong U.S.-U.K. ties.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] llamatron@lemmy.world 137 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (15 children)

It blows my mind that so many Americans saw this petulant, orange manchild and thought yes, this man should lead us.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I'm at the point where I don't want to be cynical, and I don't have any proof, but.....would anyone put him past rigging the election? That's where my head is at right now. It makes sense. I don't know how he rigged the election. I don't know how TO rig an election.

But seeing him, and being told he won the popular vote.....my brain can't process the core concept of trump being popular. But if you say he rigged it, my brain can follow that concept without having smoke come out my ears.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Popular by total votes tallied, not popular by total eligible voters. Only about 50-70% of all eligible voters vote - call it 2/3. Campaigning is less about swinging voters between parties and more about convincing them to show up for the ballot. This is Trump's specialty. He is so inflammatory that he has driven more people to the polls, both for and against him. But if you look at the actual stats, 2016 was won with just 27% of the eligible voter population's vote and 2024 with 32%. The runner up tallied 29% and 31%, respectively. 3rd party votes don't exceed 2% which means both the winner and the 2nd place candidates collected a total vote count about equal to the number of people who didn't show up at all.

More towards what people actually see in him, they think he's their friend. His vitriol makes them beleive he's really just in this for an altruistic motive about returning the USA to a place of freedom (for the white Christian patriarchal population). They don't think he is in it for financial gain. They think they're poor because democrats gave money to brown people. They think being a dick to other countries will bring the USA back to a self-sustaining country. They beleive corporations will do the right thing in response and choose to no longer exploit poor countries. They think the decline of US citizens' private wealth is from welfare policies, not from corporate greed. They don't recognize that the USA's 1950s-60s economic boom was rooted in being the only major industrial nation that was NOT bombed to kingdom come in the 40s.

And above all, I beleive conservatives generally lack empathy. They beleive this dichotomy that everyone has equal opportunity but also that behavior is racial. They can't bring themselves to beleive minorities have it rougher due to systemic issues. They can't understand how poverty, teen pregnancy, drug abuse, lacking Healthcare, inability to afford higher education, or predisposition to violence is more easily predicted by birth location than anything else. Until it happens to one of their own, one who looks like them, looks like a daughter, looks like a brother. This frees them to vote for Trump and beleive in a year, they'll be wealthy, screaming "fuck you, got mine" to the lesser demographics that just won't play nice. That gives way to the most upsetting irony. They're voting for a "businessman" who will "run the country like a business" yet somehow cannot understand, at all, Trump is a grifter that is excellent at branding himself as successful on the backs of bankrupted companies that gave him golden parachutes. Why would anyone want trump to run the country like a Trump business? Bankruptcies, layoffs, shutdowns, downsizes, and a fat check for Trump? Because it's about race, religion, and societal norms. It's believing that being white, Christian, and patriarchal should automatically come with success in America. All of the hypocrisy and side effects is just the cost of gaining personal wealth.

[–] Agrivar@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I agree with all of your points.
You also seem to write grammatically correct sentences bereft of the typical misspellings that confound ESL writers... which makes me wonder: how did you manage to get "believe" wrong FIVE times, and then nail it when it became "believing" at the end?

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Because i/e has dumb, inconsistent rules and I've apparently I've written it wrong enough times that my autocorrect has taken it to be the correct, learned spelling. At least it's better than when it takes charge of the sentence and completely flips n't contractions. Those are sneaky and incredibly confusing if not caught.

But I keep shopping for ceiling materials and I can recognize cieling is wrong, so that's nice.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)