this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
344 points (99.4% liked)

Canada

8706 readers
1441 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

Reminder of the Liberal's record on proportional representation: "Liberals never wanted to β€œmake every vote count.”… Electoral reform has become a bonbon offered at election. As far back as 1919, Liberals have campaigned on the promise of proportional representation"

Mark Carney's position on electoral reform: "open". However...

  1. He’s an economist, and the mathematics pairs quiet nicely with the mathematics of electoral systems.
  2. His public persona is that he is intelligent. But when asked specifically about electoral reform and proportional representation, he says he’s uncertain and open to exploring options? Why would someone as smart as him be uncertain about ensuring every vote counts?

Only the Greens/NDP consistently support proportional representation.

[–] Yoga@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Why would someone as smart as him be uncertain about ensuring every vote counts?

Because it's an absolute waste of political capital to make happen if there isn't a strong movement fighting for it.

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Even if there is no intention to improve our democracy, it's a really low bar to just agree that every vote should count...

[–] Yoga@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I agree, but I'm not the one you need to convince, it's Terry on Facebook who spends 2 hours a day complaining about bike lanes and vegans.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Oh, Terry will be super happy when PR gives him the chance to give a couple of seats to Bernier, giving him a much bigger platform to share his opinions!

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's okay, we're just having a conversation. Stakes aren't high.

[–] Yoga@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If the stakes arent high then for the love of God stop posting about electoral reform so often.

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago

In the conversation between you and me, where we already agree (mostly) on electoral reform, the stakes aren't high.

But otherwise, yes, the stakes are high.

I apologize if my discussions on proportional representation are annoying, that's not the intention. You can choose to ignore me or even block me if you feel inclined.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)