this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
1204 points (98.1% liked)

People Twitter

7687 readers
972 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mlegstrong@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 months ago (23 children)

A single molecule of water is not wet but as soon as more then one molecule is present the water is then wet. That is my hill to die on in this argument.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago (16 children)

I disagree. Mixing water and another liquid does not make the second liquid "wet" - it makes a mixture. Then if you apply that mixture to a solid the solid becomes wet until the liquid leaves through various processes and becomes dry. If that process is evaporation, the air does not become wet it becomes humid.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz -1 points 2 months ago

Water (and other liquids) make solid things wet.

If you put water and oil in a container and they separate, the interface between them is not wet.

Humid air can make things wet, but that only happens when the moisture in the air condenses onto a solid surface. Humid air will not make the surface of a lake wet even though water is condensing out of the air onto that surface.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)