this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
179 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

65819 readers
5194 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Why? We can cram 61TB into a slightly overgrown 2.5” and like half a PB per rack unit.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

Because we don't have to pack it in too much. It'd be higher capacities for cheaper for consumers

Also cooling

[–] enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (6 children)

It’s not the packaging that costs money or limits us, it’s the chips themselves. If we crammed a 3.5” form factor full of flash storage, it would be far outside the budgets of mortals.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today -1 points 2 days ago
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)