this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
386 points (99.5% liked)

PC Gaming

10989 readers
938 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gradual@lemmings.world 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

But useful idiots told me people won't work for free.

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Every Anarcho capitalist boot licker

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If someone calls themselves an anarcho-capitalist, I immediately think that person is of very low IQ trying to sound smart and educated.

At least the term libertarianism isn't a contradiction, even if it is selfish and stupid.

Sure, no kings, no masters but when you don't go the extra step to understand where the kings and masters come from, then you are just a useful idiot to the next fascist that comes along.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

yeah except libertarians love kings and masters, they just want it to be private and not collective. because they think they're going to be kings and masters in such a society. and it's always the most miserable looking dweeb because that's usually the motivation behind the fantasy.

[–] Pnut@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago

To translate your message: "Libertarians wrongly believe they are kings and masters." Evidenced by the famous Highlander line "There can be only one!"

I mean. You already pay for your road and the ambulance that can drive down it to save your life. Why would you pay more to utilise the same overburdened service? Unless you're going to pay to build a hospital, fire station, etc. what's the point? And then the maintenance bills. Libertarians cannot wait to spend all of their money on things we currently help them pay for. (I'm Canadian by the way, just to explain the paid ambulance part)