this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
557 points (97.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2856 readers
768 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The DNC cited a procedural concern, but Hogg said it is “impossible to ignore the broader context” of his criticisms.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Proving him right, by doing more to stop him from running than they're doing to stop the fascist takeover

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Well technically it's true that DNC are following protocol. Even if Hogg wasn't running challengers to his own party and insulting them publicly, the DNC would still probably be holding the party leadership chair special election later this year.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

They treat dick cheney better than they treat David Hogg.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 5 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

This is one of those things where they're following the letter of the law, but I'm 80% sure that they're only doing so because it suits them.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

It's technically not law because the DNC is a private institution, but it is written down as institution policy, so yes.

[–] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

They are a corporation. They don't owe anyone dick. They said as much last time they were in court for rat fucking Bernie.