this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
386 points (99.5% liked)
PC Gaming
10989 readers
938 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So now my thief can simply stack crates to get to a store's unguarded second level instead of grinding the acrobatics skill? Nice.
I know they try to remain faithful to the original design, but I can't help but wonder how hard it would be for the OpenMW devs to integrate a full modern physics engine such as Jolt or PhysX into the engine. Probably much easier than building one from scratch in Lua of all things!
I would love it if, after OpenMW hits 1.0, they set a new goal of feature parity with Skyrim (or Skywind).
A post 1.0 goal is to be a general engine replacement for many Bethesda titles. OpenMW would be a platform for other projects to build OpenOblivion, OpenNewVegas, etc on.
OpenMW already uses the bullet physics engine. However, it's not really exposed to the existing Lua API right now, hence Max Yari implementing physics separately in Lua.
Test footage of Oblivion assets loaded in OpenMW shows that physics like ragdolls or interactive objects is already possible.