this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
468 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

65819 readers
5133 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] errer@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (5 children)

People using it to control their computer is dumb as fuck. I dunno why AI companies are pushing the idea when they already have a killer product.

[–] TheOneCurly@lemm.ee 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The killer product being the lying machine or the deleting working code machine? I think there's a small number of people for who these tools really fit into their workflows but they are not universal so there's limited growth and they're already wildly unprofitable.

[–] errer@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Something like half a billion people use ChatGPT and competitors every week. It’s really hard to deny that these companies are successful. Doesn’t matter what the quality is, it’s clearly good enough that people continue to use it.

https://explodingtopics.com/blog/chatgpt-users

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Successful" would include "profitable".

[–] errer@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago

lol, have you seen public companies nowadays? Amazon took 9 years to turn a profit.

load more comments (1 replies)