this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
172 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10066 readers
1118 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bla bla bla.

Canadians need high speed internet services, too. Bell, Telus and Rogers are already gouging Canadians with insane prices. But it's still not enough? Fuck all that.

In Québec, there used to be several electric utility companies in different regions of the province. They kept charging too much for crappy unreliable electricity because they didn't want to invest in their shitty infrastructure to deliver electricity to their customers. They also didn't want to build infrastructures in further regions because it would cost them too much. Remind you of anyone?

Well, René Levesque, as the premier of Québec, made the province buy all the companies and nationalized them under one company: Hydro Québec. Since then, the infrastructure was expanded so the furthest regions of Québec. More dams were built. It became the pride of Québec and a great source of revenue for the province.

As it turns out, nationalizing important utility infrastructures is beneficial to the population, but trying to benefit shareholders is bad for the population.

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I dont disagree with nationalization. Its an inelastic good with a natural monopoly due to cell phone frequency limitation caps, its an obvious case for nationalization, I think it would allow cellphones to use all frequencies and their increase speed and penetration.