Once both major world militaries and hobbists are using it, it's jover. You can't close Pandora's Box. Whatever you want to call the current versions of "AI", it's only going to get better. Short of major world catastrophes, I expect it to drive not only technological advances but also energy/efficiency advances as well. The big internet conglomerates are already integrating it into search, and I fully expect within the next 5 years to have search transformed into an assistant-like chatbot (or something thereof).

I think it's shortsighted not to see the potential of accumulating society's knowledge and being able to present that to people in an understandable way.

I don't expect it to happen overnight. I'm not expecting iRobot or Android levels of consciousness any time soon, but the world is progressing toward the automation of many things - driven by Capital(ism) - which is powerful in itself.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

energy/efficiency advances

About that.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the potential of accumulating society's knowledge and being able to present that to people in an understandable way.

We call this Wikipedia, please consider donating to keep it running!

[–] MortUS@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I completely agree about supporting Wikipedia. I actually do donate to Wikipedia via subscription and recommend others do as well. Being able to just download Wikipedia is also just such a boon. That being said, Wikipedia is just that, a pedia, like an encyclopedia. It's static knowledge. It can't rephrase things or simplify them or provide more context than it already has. A phonebook to a phonecall.

I would love to see a breakthrough in energy solutions for high-processing, but I doubt I will in my lifetime, and am pessimistic about such advances even being possible.